⚠️ Warning: Information is collected from public sources and is accurate to the best of our knowledge. Please do not take the law into your own hands. This website is intended to help keep your loved ones safe by raising awareness about dangerous abusers. For inquiries, contact us on our Facebook Page: Expose Them All - Red Rose UK .

THOMAS MCKNIGHT'S HORRIFIC DOG CRUELTY IN KILMARNOCK: INJURED SPRINGER SPANIEL SUFFERS FOR DAYS

By  | 

In a disturbing case that unfolded in Kilmarnock, Thomas Raymond McKnight, born on August 1, 1965, faced justice for his neglect and mistreatment of a dog named Bobby. Residing on St Andrews Walk, McK.... Scroll down for more information.


Kilmarnock Animal Abuser

Thomas McKnight's Social Media Accounts

  • No phone numbers or social media accounts linked yet. Be the first to report one below.
  • Know a Social Media Account Linked to Thomas McKnight?

    Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.

    THOMAS MCKNIGHT'S HORRIFIC DOG CRUELTY IN KILMARNOCK: INJURED SPRINGER SPANIEL SUFFERS FOR DAYS

    In a disturbing case that unfolded in Kilmarnock, Thomas Raymond McKnight, born on August 1, 1965, faced justice for his neglect and mistreatment of a dog named Bobby. Residing on St Andrews Walk, McKnight was found guilty of failing to seek proper veterinary care for his injured Springer spaniel, which had been suffering from severe wounds caused by boiling water for five days.

    According to court records, the incident came to light on July 16, 2018, when McKnight contacted the Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SSPCA) helpline, requesting assistance for his dog. During the call, he explained that he had accidentally spilled boiling water on Bobby five days earlier. Due to financial constraints, McKnight had attempted to treat the dog's injuries himself, rather than taking him to a veterinarian. He expressed concern that Bobby’s condition was worsening, with the wounds blistering and becoming infected, and that the dog was clearly in pain.

    McKnight also stated that he was willing to relinquish ownership of Bobby, indicating his desire for the dog to receive proper care. Later that same day, an SSPCA inspector visited McKnight’s residence to assess the situation. Upon arrival, the inspector observed Bobby to be subdued, weak, and lethargic. The dog was covered with bandages on his torso and most of his back, signs of the attempts to treat his injuries at home.

    When the inspector attempted to remove the bandages to examine the wounds, only one could be safely removed, as the other was adhered to the dog’s skin, causing Bobby additional pain. Recognizing the severity of the injuries, the inspector arranged for Bobby to be taken to a local veterinary clinic. There, the dog received pain relief, general anesthesia, and antibiotics to combat infection. Veterinarians estimated that the healing process would take a significant amount of time.

    It was the inspector’s professional opinion that Bobby had endured unnecessary suffering, which led to McKnight being cautioned and subsequently charged. During the court proceedings, McKnight’s defense was presented by solicitor Gillian Swanney, who explained that the dog had now been treated, had made a full recovery, and had been re-homed to a caring family.

    Swanney further clarified that the incident was accidental. She described how McKnight was in the kitchen cooking when the dog entered and startled him while he was holding a kettle. In a reflexive response, McKnight poured water over Bobby and then attempted to treat the wounds with bandages and antiseptic powder. Despite these efforts, the dog's condition worsened over the following days.

    Ms. Swanney emphasized that McKnight had no intention of acquiring another dog, indicating remorse and a desire to prevent future incidents. Sheriff Michael Hanlon acknowledged that the incident stemmed from an accident but emphasized the importance of responsible pet ownership.

    As a result of the case, McKnight was fined £300, payable at a rate of £10 every two weeks. Additionally, he was banned from owning any animals for three years, a ban that expired in November 2021. The case drew attention to the importance of animal welfare and the consequences of neglect, even when caused by unintentional acts.

    Other Abusers in Kilmarnock

    4 ANIMAL ABUSERS IN KILMARNOCK, UK

    Red Rose UK currently has 4 Animal Abusers mapped in the Kilmarnock, UK area

    About Red Rose

    Red Rose is the UK's biggest free-to-use public database of sexual abusers, animal abusers and domestic abusers. Our mission is to promote community safety and awareness.