SHAUN BLOOMFIELD FROM CORBY ESCAPES JAIL AFTER LEERING AT KIDS AT BIRTHDAY PARTY IN NORTHAMPTONSHIRE

In a recent and highly controversial case, Shaun Bloomfield, a man with a troubling history involving child protection orders, was found attending a children’s birthday celebration in Corby, Northamptonshire, and subsequently released from custody despite serious concerns about his behavior.

Bloomfield, aged 45, had previously been subjected to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order following his conviction for engaging in sexual activity with a 12-year-old girl. This order explicitly prohibited him from being near children, yet he was caught at a 16th birthday party, where he was observed leering at the young attendees. His presence at the event was particularly alarming given his prior conviction and the restrictions placed upon him.

The incident was brought to public attention after The Sun published photographs showing Bloomfield at the party, which prompted police to investigate further. The authorities acted swiftly after receiving the tip-off, and Bloomfield was arrested in July of the previous year. His arrest was based on evidence obtained from Facebook photos that clearly depicted him at the gathering.

During his court hearing at Cambridge Crown Court, Bloomfield admitted to breaching the terms of his Sexual Offences Prevention Order. Despite the gravity of his violations, Judge Jonathan Haworth sentenced him to only six months in prison. This sentence was notably lenient considering that he could have faced up to five years behind bars for the breaches.

Furthermore, Bloomfield had already served more than half of his sentence while on remand, which meant he was eligible for release on licence for the remaining period. As a result, he was freed shortly after sentencing, raising concerns among child protection advocates and legal experts about the adequacy of the punishment.

Mark Williams-Thomas, a well-known child protection specialist, publicly criticized the court’s decision, describing it as too lenient. He emphasized that Bloomfield remains a “significant risk” to children and argued that a more appropriate response would have been a lengthy custodial sentence to mitigate potential harm.

Judge Haworth, however, stated that attending the party was not a “blatant” breach of the order, which further fueled debate about the effectiveness of current legal measures in preventing offenders from reoffending or putting children at risk. The case has sparked widespread discussion about the adequacy of sentencing and the ongoing challenges in protecting vulnerable children from known offenders in the community.