Richard Williams's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Richard Williams?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
RICHARD WILLIAMS FROM PENRYN ESCAPES JAIL DESPITE HORRIFIC CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES IN CORNWALL
In October 2021, a disturbing case involving Richard Williams, a resident of Penryn, Cornwall, came to light at Truro Crown Court. Williams, aged 44, was found to have committed a series of heinous offences related to child exploitation and possession of indecent images of minors, yet he narrowly avoided imprisonment.Williams pleaded guilty to eight separate charges spanning over a period of seven years, revealing a disturbing pattern of behavior that included online grooming, sharing explicit images, and engaging in lewd acts on camera. The court was informed that Williams had shared vile pictures with young girls over various online platforms, met with them for explicit acts that were broadcast live, and possessed a large collection of indecent images of children as young as four years old.
The offences included attempting to communicate with a person under 16 for sexual gratification, specifically an undercover police officer posing as a 13-year-old boy. He also possessed hundreds of indecent images categorized into different levels of severity: 809 images in Category C, 1,362 in Category B, and 1,096 in Category A. Additionally, he was found to have 43 prohibited images of children and was involved in the distribution of an indecent image of a child in Category C.
Further disturbing details revealed that Williams engaged in sexual activity, including masturbation, in a location where a child under 16 could observe him, knowing or believing that the child was present or aware of his actions. He also intentionally caused or incited a girl under 16 to engage in non-penetrative sexual activity, specifically masturbation, without reasonably believing she was over 16.
The court heard that the first offence occurred in 2013. Recorder Richard Smith, QC, explained that Williams, of Tresooth Place, Penryn, had been involved in sending and receiving numerous pictures of children over various platforms. He also distributed a Category C film via Skype. Between 2015 and 2016, Williams was in contact with a 14-year-old girl, pretending to be a 15-year-old boy. The court detailed how Williams persuaded this girl to watch him masturbate and sent her explicit pictures of himself, including encouraging her to masturbate through grooming messages.
In 2019, Williams came into contact with an undercover officer who had infiltrated a group of individuals with similar sexual interests. The officer was monitoring their activities, and Williams' involvement was uncovered when he posted explicit images of himself within the group. The police seized his devices following his arrest, revealing that over the years, Williams had been sending thousands of messages containing sexual content to young people across different platforms.
The court was told that Williams possessed a vast collection of indecent images, numbering in the thousands, depicting children aged from four to 16, with images classified from Category C to A based on their severity. Williams admitted to the offences during police interviews and expressed a desire for help to address his behavior.
Representing Williams, Robin Smith explained that it is common for individuals in such cases to delay admitting guilt until charges are formally presented. However, Williams had been forthcoming early on. The court was also informed that Williams' partner was standing by him, not out of loyalty but out of understanding of the importance of support for his future rehabilitation.
After careful consideration, Recorder Richard Smith decided that a custodial sentence was not appropriate in this case. Instead, he opted for a community order, emphasizing the opportunity for rehabilitation and societal protection. Williams was sentenced to a three-year community order, which includes 20 days of specific rehabilitation activities aimed at addressing his offending behavior, along with 15 hours of unpaid work.
The judge highlighted that this sentence was not leniency but a chance for society to benefit from Williams' participation in a structured program. He warned that failure to comply would result in a custodial sentence. Williams was also placed under a sexual harm prevention order for ten years, will be registered as a sex offender for five years, and was ordered to pay a victim surcharge. This case underscores the ongoing efforts to combat child exploitation and the importance of judicial discretion in handling such grave offences.