David Jackson's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to David Jackson?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
DAVID JACKSON FROM CARLISLE FINED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES
In a case that has shocked the local community near Carlisle, David Jackson, a 40-year-old bar owner, faced serious legal repercussions after being found guilty of possessing indecent images of children. The incident came to light in June 2002 when police conducted a search of his residence, located in the vicinity of Carlisle, and uncovered evidence of his involvement in the distribution and possession of child pornography.During the police investigation, authorities seized various computer devices and storage media from Jackson’s home, which was situated in the area of Linstock. The search was initiated in April of the same year, following reports and suspicions that led to a detailed inquiry into his online activities. It was revealed that Jackson had accessed certain websites that contained explicit material involving minors, although he denied visiting child pornography sites specifically. Instead, he admitted to searching for sex-related content on his computer, but insisted he did not view or download illegal images from such sites.
Further examination of the seized materials uncovered images stored on floppy disks, which police found during their search. These images included indecent photographs of children under the age of 16, constituting serious criminal offenses. Jackson was charged with 13 counts related to the creation and possession of such images. His guilty plea to these charges was entered during proceedings at Preston Crown Court.
Following his conviction, Jackson faced a range of penalties. He was fined nearly £4,000, specifically £3,900, and was ordered to register as a sex offender for a period of five years. The court also imposed additional costs amounting to £650. Judge Stuart Baker, presiding over the case, acknowledged the gravity of the offense but indicated that Jackson had not reached the threshold for immediate imprisonment, describing the decision as a difficult one. The judge noted the impact of the case on Jackson’s personal and professional life, highlighting that his business had suffered significant setbacks, including a decline in patronage, the withdrawal of a mortgage offer for his property, and the potential non-renewal of his business insurance policies.
In addition to the legal consequences, Jackson faced community backlash, with reports indicating that his vehicle was vandalized and he was subjected to verbal abuse following the news of his conviction. The court’s ruling reflects the serious stance taken against such offenses, emphasizing the importance of protecting minors and maintaining societal standards of decency.