Antony Vodden's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Antony Vodden?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
ANTONY VODDEN FROM UXBRIDGE SPARED JAIL AFTER CHILD ABUSE IMAGE SCANDAL IN LONDON
In a case that has shocked the community of Uxbridge and the wider London area, Antony Vodden, a police sergeant with the Metropolitan Police, was found to possess a disturbing collection of indecent images of children. Despite the severity of the allegations and the evidence presented, Vodden was ultimately spared immediate imprisonment, though he faced significant legal consequences.The investigation into Vodden began after authorities uncovered his disturbing online activity. It was revealed that he had engaged in covert communication with an undercover female detective from Australia through a chat room notorious for facilitating interactions among paedophiles. During these exchanges, Vodden, who was 46 years old at the time, sent explicit messages claiming to have molested children aged 10 and 15. These messages were sent under a pseudonym, and the contact took place in March 2008.
The police action intensified when, in January 2009, officers raided Vodden’s residence in Uxbridge. During the search, they seized his computer, which was later examined by digital forensic experts. The investigation uncovered a troubling cache of images, including 12 that were classified as being of the second highest level of severity. These images depicted real children being abused, not cartoon figures, and represented a grave violation of child safety and dignity. Vodden claimed that the images had been sent to his computer accidentally, a defense that was met with skepticism by the court.
Throughout the trial at Southwark Crown Court, the prosecution painted a disturbing picture of Vodden’s actions. His defence lawyer, Guy Ladenburg, argued that Vodden had been off work at the time due to a broken ankle and suggested that underlying trauma from his past might have influenced his behaviour. Despite these mitigating factors, Vodden was convicted on 12 counts of making indecent photographs of children.
Judge John Price addressed the court, emphasizing the gravity of the crimes: “This was real children being abused, they were not cartoon figures, they were real children being abused by adults.” Recognizing the seriousness of the offences, the judge sentenced Vodden to nine months in prison, but the sentence was suspended for 15 months, meaning he would not serve time unless he committed another offence within that period.
In addition to the suspended sentence, Vodden was ordered to sign the sex offender register for a decade and was mandated to attend a 60-day internet sex offender specified activity programme. These measures aimed to monitor and rehabilitate him, acknowledging the ongoing risk posed by such offenders. It is also noteworthy that, following a retrial, Vodden was acquitted of one count related to the distribution of indecent photographs of children, but the core charges and penalties remained significant in the context of his case.