Alan Davison's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Alan Davison?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
ALAN DAVISON'S HORRIFIC ANIMAL ABUSE IN SUNDERLAND: COURT SENTENCE AND DETAILS REVEALED
Alan Davison, a resident of Sunderland, has been convicted of heinous acts of animal cruelty involving his pet dog. The case, which garnered significant attention, revealed that Davison was caught on camera physically abusing his Staffordshire bull terrier on nine separate occasions. The incidents took place between June 30 and July 14, 2017, in his home area of Lynthorpe, Sunderland SR2 0ES.Despite being tried in his absence, Davison was found guilty of causing unnecessary suffering to his dog and of failing to ensure proper animal welfare. The evidence against him was compelling, primarily based on footage captured by a concerned neighbour who was appalled by the defendant’s conduct. The neighbour, who observed the abuse from her property at the back of Davison’s residence, was so disturbed by what she saw that she screamed at him to stop and promptly contacted the police.
The court heard that the physical violence inflicted upon the dog would have resulted in soft tissue trauma, including bruising, pain, and discomfort. More distressingly, the ongoing psychological impact of such treatment was emphasized, with experts noting that some dogs never fully recover from such trauma. The prosecution, led by John Ellwood on behalf of the RSPCA, detailed the disturbing nature of the abuse. He stated, “The basic facts are that he caused suffering to his Staffordshire bull terrier by hitting, kicking, and frightening the dog.”
Ellwood explained that the case came to light thanks to the neighbour’s vigilant and caring actions. She had witnessed Davison abusing his dog in his backyard back in March 2017 and reported her concerns to the police. Initially, the police delegated the investigation to the RSPCA, which visited Davison and issued a warning, believing the incident was a reprimand rather than abuse. Davison claimed at that time that he was merely reprimanding his dog, but the neighbour’s concerns grew as she continued to observe regular instances of violence.
Over time, the neighbour decided to record the defendant’s actions. She captured nine videos showing Davison kicking, hitting, and threatening his dog with weapons, as well as throwing water on it. The footage depicted a pattern of bizarre and confusing behaviour, with the dog being hit and then coaxed back towards Davison, only to be struck again. Some videos showed the dog being thrown into the house, yelping in distress. The neighbour described the conduct as severe and psychologically damaging, noting that the dog’s repeated yelping and the inconsistent treatment would have caused significant psychological suffering. A veterinarian who reviewed the videos confirmed that the physical abuse would have caused bruising and pain, but emphasized that the ongoing fear and stress could have lasting effects that some dogs might never recover from.
When questioned by the RSPCA, Davison initially denied any wrongdoing. However, once presented with the evidence, including the videos, he admitted to his actions and expressed remorse. His defence lawyer, Tony Southwick, highlighted that Davison suffers from mental health issues and has sought medical help. Southwick explained that Davison regrets the loss of his pet, which had been his only companionship at the time, and was willing to have the dog signed over to a new owner. He also noted that Davison’s actions were influenced by his mental health condition.
In sentencing, the court imposed a three-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months. Davison was ordered to pay costs and charges totaling £415 and to complete 25 days of rehabilitation activities. Additionally, he was banned from owning or caring for any animals for a period of ten years, with no right of appeal for the first five years of this ban. The judge emphasized the seriousness of the offence and the need to protect animals from such cruelty in the future.