Aaron Harding-Beanland's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Aaron Harding-Beanland?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
AARON HARDING-BEANLAND FROM BISPHAM ACQUITTED IN BLACKPOOL CRUELTY CASE INVOLVING XL BULLIES
In a recent legal proceeding held in Blackpool, Aaron Harding-Beanland, a resident of Red Bank Road, Bispham, was formally acquitted of charges related to the alleged cruelty towards two American XL Bulldog dogs kept at his former residence on School Road, Marton. The case drew significant attention from animal welfare authorities and the local community alike.Harding-Beanland, born around 1984, faced accusations that he had caused unnecessary suffering to the two dogs, named Marnie and Sparkles. According to the prosecution, Marnie, a female dog, was found suffering from hypothermia and dehydration, while Sparkles was reported to have a low body weight, indicating neglect and poor care. These allegations prompted a raid by the RSPCA, which executed a warrant to seize the animals from Harding-Beanland’s property.
During the court proceedings, Oliver Savington, representing the RSPCA, detailed the condition of the seized dogs and emphasized the severity of their suffering. However, Harding-Beanland’s defense presented compelling evidence to demonstrate that he was not present at the property during the time the alleged cruelty occurred. He testified that he had been incarcerated for a period of six years and nine months due to firearms offences, and that he was subsequently released into approved accommodation under probation conditions.
Furthermore, Harding-Beanland acknowledged that he had purchased Marnie for £4,500 from a breeder in Preston prior to his imprisonment. Despite the serious nature of the allegations, the court ultimately found that the case had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge expressed concern over certain aspects of the case but clarified that Harding-Beanland was not responsible for the alleged neglect at the time of the incidents.
In delivering the verdict, the judge stated, “Certain aspects of this case disturb me. You were clearly not living at the property at the time, and the case has not been proved to the required criminal standard.” As a result, Harding-Beanland was acquitted of all charges related to the cruelty allegations. The case highlights the importance of thorough investigation and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in criminal proceedings involving animal welfare.