STUART SMITH FROM CROOK CAUGHT VIEWING CHILD ABUSE IMAGES IN DURHAM

In June 2020, authorities responded to concerns raised about Stuart Smith, a resident of Crook, after reports indicated that indecent images had been accessed from his internet connection. On June 26, police officers arrived at Smith’s residence on Dawson Street, where they conducted a thorough search of his property. During the investigation, they seized three computer devices, which were later examined and found to contain numerous illegal images.

The forensic analysis revealed that Smith had viewed these images within the ten days prior to the search. The images included a total of 111 offending pictures, with 46 classified as the most severe category of child abuse material. Additionally, investigators discovered 24 other prohibited images and five extreme pornographic images on the devices. The search terms used by Smith during his online activity suggested a deliberate intent to seek out such disturbing content.

Prosecutor Shada Mellor outlined the findings in Durham Crown Court, emphasizing the gravity of the case. During police interviews in February, Smith admitted to being aware of all the material found on his devices, except for those categorized as extreme pornography. He confessed to viewing these images over a period of approximately four years. Smith explained to authorities that viewing these images provided him with a sense of calm, but he denied any sexual arousal or attraction to children.

Stuart Smith, aged 31, and residing on Dawson Street in Crook, faced multiple charges. He pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children, possession of prohibited images, and possession of extreme pornography. The court was informed that Smith’s actions were deliberate and ongoing over several years.

In sentencing, Recorder Gumsley acknowledged the importance of addressing Smith’s behavior through community-based interventions. While he recognized the seriousness of the offenses, he also emphasized that the public would benefit more from Smith receiving support and rehabilitation rather than immediate imprisonment. Consequently, the court imposed a nine-month prison sentence, suspended for two years. As part of his probation, Smith is required to participate in 90 days of sex offenders’ group work and complete 30 days of rehabilitation activities under probation supervision.

Furthermore, Smith is mandated to register as a sex offender and must adhere to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order for ten years. The court’s decision aims to both punish and rehabilitate, ensuring that Smith’s actions are closely monitored and that he receives appropriate support to prevent future offenses.