STANLEY DAVIS FROM WORCESTER BANNED FROM CONTACT WITH CHILDREN UNDER 16 AFTER SEX OFFENDER ORDER
In January 2009, a significant legal action was taken against Stanley Davis, a 68-year-old resident of Worcester, in connection with his past conduct involving minors.Davis, who resides on Cherwell Close in the Warndon area of Worcester, was formally ordered to register as a sex offender and was issued a sexual offences prevention order by Worcester Magistrates Court.
This order was granted following an application made by West Mercia Constabulary, which outlined concerns about Davis’s interactions with children and his previous conduct.
Davis did not oppose the application, and during the court proceedings, Kristin Ewing, representing West Mercia police, detailed the reasons behind the order.
She highlighted incidents of what she described as “inappropriate contact” with minors, which formed the basis for the court’s decision.
Specifically, Davis was previously cautioned in May 2000 for taking an indecent photograph of a young girl.
The police investigation also revealed that between February 2007 and May 2008, a 15-year-old girl with minor learning difficulties had visited Davis’s home on multiple occasions.
During police interviews, the girl disclosed that she had been undressed by Davis, touched inappropriately, exposed himself, and given her money.
These allegations prompted further police action.
Officers conducted interviews with Davis and examined his mobile phone, which was sent for forensic testing.
Unfortunately, all photographs had been deleted from the device, with Davis claiming that his phone’s memory was full.
Despite this, the police continued their investigation, and an independent social worker later produced a report.
The report concluded that Davis’s behavior was consistent with the misconduct for which he had previously been cautioned.
The sexual offences prevention order, which can last up to five years, imposes strict restrictions on Davis.
He is prohibited from having any form of contact—direct or indirect—with any child under the age of 16, including through third parties.
Additionally, Davis is barred from allowing children under 16 into his home unless accompanied by an adult.
He is also forbidden from filming, photographing, or recording anyone under 16 without explicit permission from a parent or guardian.
During the court hearing, Barry Newton, representing Davis, emphasized that there had been no formal conviction related to his contact with the 15-year-old girl.
He also cautioned Davis about the serious consequences of breaching the order, making it clear that any violation could result in a jail sentence.
The court’s decision reflects ongoing concerns about safeguarding minors and preventing any further inappropriate conduct by Davis in Worcester.
