Shaun Bell's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Shaun Bell?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
SHAUN BELL FROM CLYDEBANK ESCAPES JAIL AFTER CHILD ABUSE IMAGE SCANDAL
In August 2019, a disturbing case involving a teenager from Clydebank came to light, revealing the serious nature of his involvement with indecent images of children. Shaun Bell, who was only 13 years old at the time the offences began in August 2014, faced charges related to the possession and distribution of highly inappropriate and illegal material.Bell, who had recently turned 18 in March of that year, admitted to multiple charges during his court appearance at Dumbarton Sheriff Court. These charges included taking or allowing the taking of indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of children over a period spanning two and a half years, starting when he was just 13. Additionally, he pleaded guilty to possessing indecent images of children between January 2016 and May 2017, as well as possessing extreme pornographic images at his residence on Crown Avenue during the same period.
The court proceedings involved background reports, which were ordered prior to sentencing. Defence lawyer Rosalyn McTaggart argued that Bell, who had since moved to a different address within the Clydebank area, was willing to undertake all elements of a non-custodial sentence. She acknowledged the gravity of his actions but emphasized that Bell was remorseful and open to rehabilitation. She stated, “He said he was glad he had come to the attention of the authorities and that he was going to be dealt with. That is a remarkable comment to make, and perhaps gives hope that this is a young man capable of rehabilitation, who is willing and eager to access assistance.”
However, Sheriff William Gallacher expressed serious concern over the extensive period during which Bell engaged in these activities, noting the deliberate nature of his behaviour. The sheriff highlighted the significant impact of such offences, not only on the victims but also on society at large. “The extensive period, and extensive and deliberate categorisation of his behaviour, causes me concern. This was done over a significant period of time, with a significant result,” he said. The sheriff also pointed out the harm caused to those involved in producing such material, emphasizing that demand for such content perpetuates further victimization.
Despite the severity of the offences, Sheriff Gallacher decided against sending Bell to prison. Instead, he imposed a community payback order, which requires Bell to be supervised by social workers for the next three years. He will also be placed on the sex offenders’ register for the same duration. As part of his sentence, Bell must make any internet-enabled device available for inspection at any time and is prohibited from deleting or hiding browsing history. Additionally, he was ordered to complete 225 hours of unpaid community service within nine months.
As Bell left the courtroom, the sheriff issued a stern warning: “This is a straightforward alternative to sending you to prison, and I’ll have no hesitation in doing that if you don’t comply.” The case underscores the ongoing concerns about online child exploitation and the importance of judicial measures aimed at rehabilitation and public safety.