Photo of nicholas meredith @ Newcastle (Child Sexual Abuser) – Red Rose UK

NICHOLAS MEREDITH JAILED IN NEWCASTLE FOR POSSESSING INDECENT IMAGES OF YOUNG BOYS

NICHOLAS MEREDITH

Sentenced
 |   | 
Newcastle Child Sexual Abuser 1,161 Views 5 Comments RR32055

NICHOLAS MEREDITH JAILED IN NEWCASTLE FOR POSSESSING INDECENT IMAGES OF YOUNG BOYS

In February 2014, a disturbing case emerged involving Nicholas Meredith, a former preacher from Newcastle, who was found guilty of possessing a large collection of indecent images of young boys.

The police investigation was initiated after officers conducted a search at Meredith’s residence on Booth Street in Newcastle, uncovering a troubling cache of illicit material.

During the raid, officers found the 46-year-old man with his trousers undone, surrounded by DVDs, which raised immediate concern.

The search was prompted by a visit to his home, where officers encountered delays in answering the door.

When they finally gained entry, they observed Meredith in a state that suggested he was caught off guard, with DVDs of young people scattered around him.

Prosecutor Neil Ahuja described the scene to Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court, stating, “There was some delay in him answering the door and there was some concern because his trousers were undone and there was a number of DVDs of young people present.” He further revealed that Meredith admitted to officers that he fantasized about young people, a confession that added gravity to the case.

Authorities obtained permission to inspect Meredith’s computer, which revealed a disturbing browsing history.

The investigation uncovered visits to websites containing terms such as ‘boys,’ ‘teens,’ and ‘shirtless,’ indicating a clear interest in underage individuals.

Meredith also mentioned that there might be some images stored in his pictures folder.

Further examination of Meredith’s laptop revealed a significant number of indecent images.

These were categorized into different levels of severity, with the least serious being level one.

The police found a large quantity of these images, including 16 at level two and six at the most serious level five.

In addition to images, officers discovered videos, including six classified as level one and two videos at level two.

It was also noted that Meredith was already subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) at the time of his arrest.

Despite this, he admitted to four charges of making indecent images of children, confirming that he had been storing these illicit pictures on his laptop.

Representing Meredith, Stuart Muldoon, emphasized that his client showed genuine remorse and acknowledged that he had a problem.

Muldoon explained, “He does show genuine remorse and accepts that he has got a problem.

He was convicted previously and he wanted to move on with his life.

But he moved to Stoke-on-Trent away from his support network in Wolverhampton.

When he came to here he believed he could move on, but he now accepts that in fact, he could not.” Muldoon added that Meredith had been under stress, which led to a relapse into previous offending behaviors.

He expressed hope that Meredith would recognize the triggers and work on addressing them both in custody and upon release, acknowledging the difficulty he would face in the future.

Judge David Fletcher sentenced Nicholas Meredith to 12 months in prison.

Additionally, he ordered Meredith to sign the Sex Offenders’ Register for a period of ten years.

The judge emphasized the seriousness of the offense, stating, “I don’t need to give you a lecture about this type of behaviour.

You are fully aware of the damage that these sort of images do to the children portrayed in them.

I don’t need to tell you why these images are so serious.” Judge Fletcher also highlighted that Meredith’s previous SOPO was replaced with a new order, which prohibits him from possessing any device capable of storing images or accessing the internet.

The new order also prevents him from deleting his web history or possessing any device that could store images, aiming to prevent further offenses and protect potential victims.

Court Outcome

Sentenced

Detected legal outcome

and two videos at level two.It was also noted that Meredith was already subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) at the time of his arrest. Despite this, he admitted to four charges of making indecent images of children, conf...

Court order

It was also noted that Meredith was already subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) at the time of his arrest

Prison sentence

12 months

Judge David Fletcher sentenced Nicholas Meredith to 12 months in prison

Court order

Judge Fletcher also highlighted that Meredith's previous SOPO was replaced with a new order, which prohibits him from possessing any device capable of storing images or accessing the internet

Location Information

Newcastle, Shropshire, West Midlands, England, Village, Shropshire, West Midlands, SY7

Coordinates: 52.4347, -3.1062

QR code for nicholas-meredith

Additional Information

  • No phone numbers or social media accounts linked yet. Be the first to report one below.

  • Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.


  • No known addresses linked yet. Be the first to report one below.

  • Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute addresses and social media accounts.

    Please sign in to leave a comment.
    Truth Seeker 9 months ago
    There is a case in the media at the moment where a well respected publisher of children's books has had one of their sites hacked and illegal content put in its place. Parents have immediately broken the law by accessing this site because they have made an indecent image. I am of the opinion that that action would have triggered someone who has been dealing with issues like myself and may cause them to go searching for other illegal images.
    Like 0
    Truth Seeker 9 months ago
    It is everyone's responsibility to protect vulnerable members of our communities. The Independent Enquiry into Child Sexual Abuse has concluded that every organisation has to put in place best practice to prevent abuse of any kind. This includes giving ex offenders the space to live a offence free life without harassment. I did not go looking initially for indecent images of children. They were in the links of a innocent site that I was using for research as part of my job role. Due to abuse I suffered but having not received any help at the time, I was vulnerable and became addicted due to self esteem and resilience issues caused by that abuse. I am empathetic and my criminal offending would never go from the virtual to the physical as I am fully aware of the damage that has done to me. Particularly in the light I was been abused by a teenager who was being abused himself by an adult.
    Like 0
    Truth Seeker 9 months ago
    All this post serves to do is not inform the public but put them at risk by putting ex-offenders like me into trigger moods, putting us at risk of physical harm or harassment. This has been the case as gossips got hold of this post and told my criminal neighbours which has resulted in life changing injuries. It also hinders law enforcement and rehabilitation providers from being affective in their work as inflammatory posts like this cause psychological harm that needs to be healed before any work can be done. In an overcrowded prison system this is not always possible and offenders get released having not done any rehabilitation work. This site is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Leave this work to the legal authorities as you are as much an abuser as you are accusing some of us of. I will give you seven days to remove this post. I will than be taking legal action to have not only the post removed but the whole site shut down under new Online Safety Bill which includes inflammatory posts.
    Like 0
    Truth Seeker 9 months ago
    I have never been barred from using the internet, owning a computer or any device that can generate or store a photo. Police attended my home residence to check devices for illegal content as they did on that day on scheduled visits. The police had already informed the day before they were going to visit. I felt this was harassment which put me in trigger mood as led me to reoffend. The DVDs mentioned were on loan from a university library and were either part of my studies or personal research to understand what made me offend in the first place. They were in a pile by the side of the TV not scattered. I now have that understanding and have no intention of reoffending and those who are in my support network can see that.
    Like 0
    Truth Seeker 9 months ago
    If you are going to publish inflammatory information about me, please make sure your fact are correct. I have been convicted of non-contact offences, I have not physically or sexually abused anyone, in fact I was the one who was abused as a child. The information on the court proceedings contains misinformation some provided by the police, it was supposition as to why I delayed opening the door at a scheduled police visit not a raid. The fact is it was for a medical reason not what the police presented.
    Like 0