Neil Burrows's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Neil Burrows?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
NEIL BURROWS FROM POTTON ESCAPES JAIL AFTER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGES IN LUTON
In January 2014, Neil Burrows, a 33-year-old resident of Potton, was involved in a serious case concerning the possession and distribution of indecent images of children. Despite the gravity of his actions, Burrows was spared immediate imprisonment during his court hearing at Luton Crown Court, where he faced multiple charges related to child exploitation.Judge David Farrell QC addressed Burrows directly, expressing his disappointment and shame over the defendant’s conduct. However, the judge also emphasized that, in this particular case, incarceration was not deemed the appropriate punishment. Instead, Burrows was handed a community-based sentence, reflecting a nuanced approach to his rehabilitation.
The court proceedings revealed that police officers executed a search warrant at Burrows’ residence on Sheffield Close. During the raid, law enforcement officials discovered a disturbing collection of 70 indecent images of children stored on his computer. These images varied in severity, classified from level one to level four, with level five representing the most severe content. The prosecution, led by James Edenborough, detailed the findings, noting that 39 images were rated as level one, two images as level two, 21 as level three, and eight as level four. Additionally, authorities uncovered a further 267 images of an extremely pornographic nature, intensifying the seriousness of the case.
It was also revealed that police had previously received a tip-off about a compromised website containing indecent images, which ultimately led them to Burrows. The defendant admitted to downloading and possessing these images during two police interviews. Although Burrows claimed he believed the individuals depicted were aged 18 or 19, investigators found evidence suggesting otherwise. Officers observed that some images appeared to feature children no older than 15, with others showing children as young as four years old.
During sentencing, Judge Farrell condemned Burrows’ actions, stating, “You clearly did this merely for your own perverted, sexual gratification. While you were just downloading these images, by doing so you were encouraging the people who make them – as in produce them – in what they do.” The judge acknowledged that Burrows might have experienced past difficulties, but he emphasized that such circumstances did not justify his criminal behavior. Recognizing the need for treatment and supervision, the court imposed a three-year community order, requiring Burrows to complete a sex offenders’ treatment program.
Furthermore, Burrows was prohibited from using computers, cameras, or any digital devices capable of storing images for five years unless equipped with software to prevent access to indecent material. He was also barred from making contact with females under 18 without parental or guardian consent. As part of the sentence, Burrows was ordered to pay £160 in court costs. The judge issued a stern warning that any breach of these conditions could result in a substantial prison sentence, underscoring the seriousness with which the court viewed his offenses.