MARCUS BIRD SKEGNESS SEX OFFENDER JAILED FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADDRESS

In December 2012, Marcus Bird, a convicted sex offender from Skegness, was sentenced to 12 months in prison at Lincoln Crown Court for failing to comply with legal requirements to update his address with the authorities. The case highlighted ongoing issues with compliance among sex offenders and the importance of strict monitoring by law enforcement.

Bird, who was mandated to register his residential address with police authorities, initially claimed to officers that he was residing at a flat located at Kenning House on Lincoln Road in Skegness. However, when police officers conducted a follow-up visit to verify his whereabouts, they discovered that Bird was no longer staying at that address. This discrepancy prompted further investigation, leading to his eventual arrest at Wainfleet.

During questioning, Bird explained that he had intended to move into Kenning House immediately after his release from prison on October 31. However, he was reportedly so disgusted with the condition of the property that he chose to sleep rough instead. Subsequently, he secured alternative accommodation on South Parade in Skegness, where he was found by police.

Andrew Scott, the prosecutor, detailed that Bird had previously served five separate prison sentences for failing to notify authorities of his address after being placed on the sex offenders’ register. His registration period was set for five years following his conviction in July of the previous year for exposing himself in front of a young child. This history underscored the repeated nature of his non-compliance.

Bird, aged 40 and residing on South Parade in Skegness, admitted to breaching the conditions of the sex offenders’ register. His failure to provide accurate address information was considered a serious violation of the legal obligations imposed upon him.

Judge Michael Heath addressed Bird directly, stating, “You have persistently failed to comply. If you keep on breaching your obligations, the sentences will get longer and longer up to the maximum.” The judge’s remarks emphasized the importance of strict adherence to the rules designed to protect the public from known offenders.

Neil Sands, representing Bird, argued that his client had not committed any further sexual offences. He pointed out that Bird had returned to the area where he claimed he would be living and did not attempt to conceal his identity when arrested. Sands acknowledged Bird’s understanding that his own actions had led to his current predicament, stating, “He understands that he is the author of his own misfortune.”