Diane Boyden's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Diane Boyden?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
DIANE BOYDEN FROM BLYTH FACES COURT OVER ELDERLY DOG'S SUFFERING
In a distressing case that has drawn attention to animal welfare concerns in Blyth, Northumberland, Diane Boyden, born on January 1, 1964, and residing at Ark Royal Close, NE24 4DQ, was found guilty in 2023 of neglecting her elderly dog, Teagan. The case highlights the tragic consequences of failing to seek timely veterinary care for a pet in distress.On October 15, 2022, RSPCA inspector Kirsty Keogh-Laws responded to a welfare concern at Boyden’s residence. The inspector’s visit was prompted by reports that the 14-year-old Staffordshire Bull Terrier, Teagan, was in a dire state of health. Upon arrival, the inspector observed a dog that was severely underweight, with her hips, ribs, and spine clearly visible through her skin. A large, hard lump approximately the size of a tennis ball was found on Teagan’s right shoulder, and another lump was present on her back leg. The dog exhibited difficulty walking, appeared uncoordinated, and showed signs of disorientation. She struggled to stand for any length of time and seemed confused, indicating a significant level of suffering.
During questioning, Boyden admitted that Teagan had not been taken to a veterinarian for several years. With her consent, inspector Keogh-Laws arranged for the dog to be examined by a veterinary professional. The vet’s assessment was grim: Teagan was suffering from multiple health issues, including severe emaciation, a large mass on her shoulder, and other lumps on her body. The veterinarian noted that the dog was likely suffering from chronic kidney disease or a severe form of starvation, which had gone untreated for an extended period.
The veterinarian’s report emphasized the importance of regular health checks, stating that early detection of health problems could have prevented much of Teagan’s suffering. The vet concluded that the dog was in a critical condition and recommended humane euthanasia, which was carried out immediately to alleviate her pain.
Inspector Keogh-Laws expressed her sorrow over the case, stating, “This is a very sad case where a dog suffered because she didn’t get the veterinary treatment she needed earlier. Owners should always take their pet to a vet if there are any concerns about their health to avoid them suffering unnecessarily.”
In court, Boyden was ordered to pay costs of £100, a fine of £120, and a victim surcharge of £48. Additionally, she received a ten-year ban on owning or keeping animals, which will remain in effect until March 2033. This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of responsible pet ownership and timely veterinary intervention to prevent unnecessary suffering.