David Rees's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to David Rees?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
PORTSLADE MAN DAVID REES CAUGHT WITH INDECENT IMAGES AND SENTENCED TO UNPAID WORK
In December 2019, a serious case involving a Portslade resident named David Rees came to light, highlighting the ongoing issue of individuals involved in the possession of illicit material. Rees, aged 55, was found to have stored a significant number of indecent images on his personal computer, which was located in his home in Portslade.Specifically, authorities discovered that Rees possessed a total of 884 images classified as Category C, indicating material of a certain severity involving minors. The case was brought before Brighton Magistrates’ Court, where Rees faced charges related to the possession of these indecent images of children.
During the court proceedings, Rees admitted to the charges, acknowledging his possession of the illicit material. As part of his sentencing, magistrates ordered him to undertake 200 hours of unpaid community work, emphasizing the seriousness of his actions and the need for rehabilitation.
In addition to the community service, Rees was required to attend 12 sessions focused on rehabilitation, aimed at addressing the underlying issues related to his offending behavior. The court also imposed a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) on Rees, which is a legal measure designed to restrict his future activities and prevent further harm.
This order specifically prohibits Rees from using personal computers without prior approval from the police, and it mandates ongoing monitoring of his computer usage. Furthermore, he must seek permission before using any work or public computers, ensuring that authorities can oversee his activities and prevent any recurrence of similar offenses.
The case underscores the importance of vigilant law enforcement and judicial measures in tackling crimes involving the exploitation of minors and the possession of illegal images. Rees’s case serves as a reminder of the legal consequences faced by individuals involved in such activities, and the ongoing efforts to protect vulnerable populations from exploitation.