Christopher Wright's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Christopher Wright?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
CHRISTOPHER WRIGHT FROM ABINGDON ESCAPES PRISON AFTER CHILD SEX ABUSE IMAGE CHARGES
In a recent court hearing held in Abingdon, Christopher Wright, aged 27 and residing in Parkside, Marcham, narrowly avoided a custodial sentence after admitting to possessing indecent images of children. The charges against Wright stem from a period spanning nearly five years, from September 23, 2010, to June 10, 2015, during which he was found to have stored and viewed illicit material involving minors.Wright pleaded guilty to making indecent images of children, a serious offense that has significant implications for the safety and well-being of minors. Despite the gravity of the charges, the court decided to impose a sentence of 16 weeks in prison, but this was suspended for 48 weeks, meaning Wright will not serve time unless he commits further offenses within that period.
As part of his sentencing, the court mandated Wright to participate in a 60-day sex offender treatment program aimed at addressing underlying issues and reducing the risk of reoffending. Additionally, a sexual harm prevention order was issued against him, which will remain in effect for seven years, restricting his activities and access to certain online content to protect potential victims.
Furthermore, Wright was ordered to pay a surcharge of £80, intended to fund victim support services, and an additional £85 to cover the costs incurred by the Crown Prosecution Service during the case. The court also handed down two further sentences of 16 weeks each, to run consecutively to the initial sentence, for separate charges involving making indecent images of children of category B and category C. These categories refer to the severity and nature of the images involved.
In a move to prevent any further misuse of evidence, all images, along with the memory sticks and laptop used to store them, are to be forfeited and destroyed. Wright’s case highlights the ongoing efforts by authorities in Abingdon to combat child exploitation and ensure offenders are held accountable, even when they avoid immediate imprisonment.