Andrew Rooney's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Andrew Rooney?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
ANDREW ROONEY FROM LANCASTER CONVICTED FOR ANIMAL ABUSE AND BREACH OF BAN
Andrew John Rooney, a resident of Lancaster, has been found guilty of multiple violations related to animal cruelty and breach of a court-imposed ban. Born around 1973 and residing on Mayfield Avenue, Rooney’s actions have once again brought attention to ongoing issues of animal welfare and legal enforcement in the area.Rooney was previously convicted in 2018 for keeping animals in defiance of a lifelong ban issued in 1997. Despite this prohibition, he was discovered to be in possession of two dogs, a cat, a budgie, a hamster, and a guinea pig. The authorities confirmed that Rooney had violated the court order by maintaining these animals at his residence in Lancaster, specifically on Mayfield Avenue.
The court proceedings revealed that Rooney had admitted to breaching the ban multiple times, specifically between January 17, 2016, and July 17, 2018. During this period, he kept two dogs named Shadow and Max, a cat called Magic, along with a bird, hamster, and guinea pig. The breach was considered a serious violation of the legal restrictions placed upon him to prevent further animal suffering.
In addition to the breach, Rooney pleaded guilty to causing unnecessary suffering to one of his dogs, a Labrador. The court heard that Rooney failed to seek proper veterinary treatment for the dog’s skin condition over a period from February to April 27, 2018. This neglect was deemed a significant factor in the suffering endured by the animal, highlighting the ongoing concerns about Rooney’s treatment of his pets.
As a result of his convictions, Rooney was sentenced to a 14-week jail term, which was suspended for two years. The court also ordered him to participate in rehabilitation activities and complete 150 hours of unpaid work. Furthermore, Rooney was required to pay a total of £615 in costs and charges related to the case. The case underscores the importance of strict enforcement of animal welfare laws and the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in ensuring compliance among individuals with prior convictions for animal cruelty.
