WILLIAM WINSPEAR'S SHAME: Aylesford Prison Ex-Manager Jailed for Child Pornography Crimes in Maidstone
| Red Rose Database
Aylesford Rapist
In a disturbing case that has shocked the local community, William Winspear, a former prison education manager from Aylesford, was sentenced to 18 months in prison for serious offenses involving child pornography. The court heard that Winspear, aged 49, had a long-standing career that included over 27 years of military service, reaching the rank of Staff Sergeant in the Royal Engineers, and later working at Maidstone Prison, where he specialized in computer training.
The case came to light when police uncovered his disturbing online activities. Maidstone Crown Court was informed that Winspear had accessed a website containing footage of a young girl, approximately four years old, being subjected to sexual assault by adult men. This revelation was part of a broader investigation into his online behavior.
On June 8 of the previous year, police executed a search warrant at his residence in Trewin Close, Aylesford, early in the morning at around 6 am. During the raid, officers found Winspear viewing indecent material on one of two computers present in his home. When questioned by his wife about the content on the devices, Winspear reportedly responded with a chilling admission: “Yes,” and added, “I never touched anyone. I only looked at pictures.”
Authorities seized hard drives and a digital camera from his property. The investigation revealed that Winspear had amassed a staggering collection of approximately 7,700 images, with 100 classified at the highest level of severity, level five, and 680 at level four. The images depicted children being abused in the most heinous ways, with the court describing each as a depiction of child exploitation and cruelty.
Further disturbing evidence emerged when it was revealed that Winspear had secretly filmed a young girl playing, focusing on her lower body. This act of covert filming added to the gravity of his offenses.
Winspear faced multiple charges, ultimately admitting to 33 counts of making indecent photographs of a child and one count of taking an indecent photograph of a child. The judge, Philip Statman, condemned his actions, stating, “Each one of those images depicts a child who is being abused in the most foul way.”
As part of his sentence, Winspear was prohibited from working with children and will be registered as a sex offender for the next ten years. The court's decision underscores the severity of his crimes and the impact on the community.
During the proceedings, his defense attorney, Tana Adkin, argued that Winspear was a typical hard-working man who had fallen into this depravity. She suggested that his viewing of such material was influenced by the proliferation of internet-based pornography and that he had not physically harmed any children. She also highlighted personal tragedies, including the death of his parents within an hour of each other and his struggles with depression, which she described as contributing to his addiction to the material.
It was also noted that Winspear had been in custody since October and that he planned to relocate to live with his son, distancing himself from his previous address. The court’s verdict serves as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by online exploitation and the importance of vigilance in protecting vulnerable children from such heinous acts.
The case came to light when police uncovered his disturbing online activities. Maidstone Crown Court was informed that Winspear had accessed a website containing footage of a young girl, approximately four years old, being subjected to sexual assault by adult men. This revelation was part of a broader investigation into his online behavior.
On June 8 of the previous year, police executed a search warrant at his residence in Trewin Close, Aylesford, early in the morning at around 6 am. During the raid, officers found Winspear viewing indecent material on one of two computers present in his home. When questioned by his wife about the content on the devices, Winspear reportedly responded with a chilling admission: “Yes,” and added, “I never touched anyone. I only looked at pictures.”
Authorities seized hard drives and a digital camera from his property. The investigation revealed that Winspear had amassed a staggering collection of approximately 7,700 images, with 100 classified at the highest level of severity, level five, and 680 at level four. The images depicted children being abused in the most heinous ways, with the court describing each as a depiction of child exploitation and cruelty.
Further disturbing evidence emerged when it was revealed that Winspear had secretly filmed a young girl playing, focusing on her lower body. This act of covert filming added to the gravity of his offenses.
Winspear faced multiple charges, ultimately admitting to 33 counts of making indecent photographs of a child and one count of taking an indecent photograph of a child. The judge, Philip Statman, condemned his actions, stating, “Each one of those images depicts a child who is being abused in the most foul way.”
As part of his sentence, Winspear was prohibited from working with children and will be registered as a sex offender for the next ten years. The court's decision underscores the severity of his crimes and the impact on the community.
During the proceedings, his defense attorney, Tana Adkin, argued that Winspear was a typical hard-working man who had fallen into this depravity. She suggested that his viewing of such material was influenced by the proliferation of internet-based pornography and that he had not physically harmed any children. She also highlighted personal tragedies, including the death of his parents within an hour of each other and his struggles with depression, which she described as contributing to his addiction to the material.
It was also noted that Winspear had been in custody since October and that he planned to relocate to live with his son, distancing himself from his previous address. The court’s verdict serves as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by online exploitation and the importance of vigilance in protecting vulnerable children from such heinous acts.