WILLIAM TUCKER ARGYLL, FIFE, AND GLASGOW: PENSIONER CONVICTED OF RAPE AFTER CONFESSION TO GIRL'S PARENTS
| Red Rose Database
Glasgow Fife Argyll Rapist
In a disturbing case that spans multiple locations across Scotland, William Tucker, a 74-year-old man, was found guilty of serious sexual offenses involving a young girl. The crimes took place over a four-year period, from April 2008 to April 2012, and involved addresses in Glasgow, Fife, and Argyll. The victim, who was between the ages of 12 and 16 at the time, was subjected to Tucker's predatory behavior during this period, raising grave concerns about the safety of minors in these communities.
One of the most startling aspects of this case emerged when Tucker was recorded by the girl’s parents during a phone call, in which he confessed to the crimes. Despite this incriminating evidence, Tucker later claimed in court that he had never physically touched the girl. When led away from the courtroom, he insisted, “I never touched the wean,” using a colloquial term for the girl. However, the confession recorded by her parents cast significant doubt on his claims of innocence.
During the trial, Tucker attempted to justify his admission of guilt, stating that he had only confessed to “keep the peace.” He further added, “I was lying when I said that,” suggesting that his earlier confession was not truthful. Despite his denial of any physical contact, the prosecution presented evidence that contradicted his claims, including his prior conviction for indecently assaulting a 14-year-old girl, which was revealed by prosecutor Kath Harper.
Judge Lord Summers presided over the case and made the decision to remand Tucker in custody. The judge deferred sentencing until the following month, allowing for further considerations. In his remarks, Lord Summers expressed concern about the state of Scottish prisons, noting that “the wings of some Scottish prisons are resembling geriatric wards.” He acknowledged the lack of clear guidelines from the Appeal Court regarding older offenders, indicating the complexity of sentencing in cases involving elderly individuals like Tucker. The judge also requested that Tucker’s defense counsel, Lorraine Glancy, include a reference to his age in her plea in mitigation, highlighting the importance of considering his age in the sentencing process.
One of the most startling aspects of this case emerged when Tucker was recorded by the girl’s parents during a phone call, in which he confessed to the crimes. Despite this incriminating evidence, Tucker later claimed in court that he had never physically touched the girl. When led away from the courtroom, he insisted, “I never touched the wean,” using a colloquial term for the girl. However, the confession recorded by her parents cast significant doubt on his claims of innocence.
During the trial, Tucker attempted to justify his admission of guilt, stating that he had only confessed to “keep the peace.” He further added, “I was lying when I said that,” suggesting that his earlier confession was not truthful. Despite his denial of any physical contact, the prosecution presented evidence that contradicted his claims, including his prior conviction for indecently assaulting a 14-year-old girl, which was revealed by prosecutor Kath Harper.
Judge Lord Summers presided over the case and made the decision to remand Tucker in custody. The judge deferred sentencing until the following month, allowing for further considerations. In his remarks, Lord Summers expressed concern about the state of Scottish prisons, noting that “the wings of some Scottish prisons are resembling geriatric wards.” He acknowledged the lack of clear guidelines from the Appeal Court regarding older offenders, indicating the complexity of sentencing in cases involving elderly individuals like Tucker. The judge also requested that Tucker’s defense counsel, Lorraine Glancy, include a reference to his age in her plea in mitigation, highlighting the importance of considering his age in the sentencing process.