WILLIAM McDONALD SENTENCED TO 13 YEARS FOR ABUSE IN EAST MAINS AND EAST KILBRIDE
| Red Rose Database
East Mains Rapist
In a harrowing case that has shocked the community, William McDonald, a resident of East Mains, was sentenced to 13 years in prison for the heinous sexual abuse of two young boys. The crimes, which spanned over several years, involved the systematic assault of the boys, who were as young as four and five years old when the abuse first began.
During the proceedings at Edinburgh High Court, McDonald maintained his innocence, protesting as he was led away to the cells. The presiding judge, Lord Pentland, condemned McDonald's actions as reprehensible and disgraceful, emphasizing the severity of his misconduct. He stated that the sentence was intended to reflect the gravity of the offenses and society’s collective condemnation of child sexual abuse, as well as the profound harm inflicted upon the victims.
The court heard that the abuse took place between April 1996 and February 2003, a period during which McDonald was responsible for caring for the boys. The older boy, now aged 17, recounted that the abuse occurred on multiple occasions at a house in East Kilbride and at a flat in Lochgoilhead, Argyllshire. He described how McDonald would forcibly seize him, often forcing him onto a bed, where he was subjected to sexual assault.
The younger victim, now 15, revealed that his ordeal began in November 1998 and continued until February 2003. He testified that McDonald would grab him, force him onto the floor, hold him down, and commit acts of sexual violence. These disturbing accounts painted a picture of ongoing abuse that left lasting scars on the boys.
The crimes only came to light last year when one of the victims reported the abuse to the police. A jury subsequently found McDonald guilty of multiple charges, including sodomy, encouraging the boys to perform oral sex on each other, and threatening them with harm if they disclosed the abuse. The court's verdict marked a significant step in delivering justice for the victims.
During the sentencing hearing, McDonald's defense, led by QC Donald Findlay, highlighted that McDonald was a first-time offender and remained steadfast in his claim of innocence. Despite this, the judge’s sentence reflected the serious nature of the crimes and the societal need to protect children from such predatory behavior.
During the proceedings at Edinburgh High Court, McDonald maintained his innocence, protesting as he was led away to the cells. The presiding judge, Lord Pentland, condemned McDonald's actions as reprehensible and disgraceful, emphasizing the severity of his misconduct. He stated that the sentence was intended to reflect the gravity of the offenses and society’s collective condemnation of child sexual abuse, as well as the profound harm inflicted upon the victims.
The court heard that the abuse took place between April 1996 and February 2003, a period during which McDonald was responsible for caring for the boys. The older boy, now aged 17, recounted that the abuse occurred on multiple occasions at a house in East Kilbride and at a flat in Lochgoilhead, Argyllshire. He described how McDonald would forcibly seize him, often forcing him onto a bed, where he was subjected to sexual assault.
The younger victim, now 15, revealed that his ordeal began in November 1998 and continued until February 2003. He testified that McDonald would grab him, force him onto the floor, hold him down, and commit acts of sexual violence. These disturbing accounts painted a picture of ongoing abuse that left lasting scars on the boys.
The crimes only came to light last year when one of the victims reported the abuse to the police. A jury subsequently found McDonald guilty of multiple charges, including sodomy, encouraging the boys to perform oral sex on each other, and threatening them with harm if they disclosed the abuse. The court's verdict marked a significant step in delivering justice for the victims.
During the sentencing hearing, McDonald's defense, led by QC Donald Findlay, highlighted that McDonald was a first-time offender and remained steadfast in his claim of innocence. Despite this, the judge’s sentence reflected the serious nature of the crimes and the societal need to protect children from such predatory behavior.