THOMAS BOOTH BINGLEY AND BARROW TEACHER ADMITS INDECENT IMAGES CHARGE
| Red Rose Database
Barrow Bingley Child Sexual Abuser
In August 2015, a teacher employed at Furness Academy in Barrow faced serious legal repercussions after admitting to possessing indecent images of a minor. Thomas Ben Booth, aged 33 and a resident of Bingley, Yorkshire, made a grave error in judgment when he initially contacted a teenage girl, which eventually led to her sending him explicit photographs of herself. This incident has cast a shadow over his career and personal life, highlighting the dangers and consequences of inappropriate online interactions.
Booth, who began his employment at Furness Academy in 2011, was found to have in his possession ten images of the girl, taken between September 8 and November 14 of the previous year. The police discovered these images on his mobile phone after executing a search warrant at his home in Bingley. The court proceedings revealed that Booth’s actions were deemed a significant breach of trust and conduct expected of someone in his position.
During the hearing at Carlisle Crown Court, Booth pleaded guilty to three criminal offences related to the possession of indecent images. As part of his sentencing, he was given a three-month prison sentence for each offence, though these were suspended for two years. Additionally, he was placed under a two-year community order that includes supervision, and he will be reported to safeguarding authorities, effectively banning him from working with children and vulnerable adults in the future.
Judge Peter Hughes QC addressed Booth directly, stating, “The tragedy of this case is that you are unlikely to be able to work with children and work as a teacher for the foreseeable future.” The judge emphasized the gravity of Booth’s actions, describing them as “wholly inappropriate” and a “monumentally stupid course” of conduct. Despite the severity of the case, the judge took into account a background report and references supporting Booth, who is married with children and has a wife standing by him.
Prosecutor Beccy McGregor explained that during police interviews, Booth admitted that he and the girl had discussed meeting in person but never made any concrete arrangements. She also noted that Booth had admitted to feeling flattered and gaining sexual gratification from the exchanges. The girl involved expressed feelings of shame and embarrassment over having sent the photographs, underscoring the emotional toll of the incident.
Defence lawyer Greg Hoare acknowledged Booth’s mistake, describing it as a “monumentally stupid course” and stating that Booth had taken steps to prevent any recurrence of such behavior. He clarified that Booth had not yet been struck off as a teacher but would face a disciplinary hearing after the court proceedings. The court also heard that Booth, a man of previously good character, had received numerous references and was supported by his family, including his wife and children.
Judge Hughes concluded by condemning Booth’s conduct, stating, “In my judgement it has to be met by means of a sentence of imprisonment – that is the least that I think the community and caring parents would expect.” However, after considering a background report, the judge decided to suspend the prison sentence, recognizing Booth’s remorse and understanding of the seriousness of his actions. He emphasized that this incident was not merely a mistake but an infatuation, and expressed hope that Booth now comprehends the gravity of his misconduct.
Booth, who began his employment at Furness Academy in 2011, was found to have in his possession ten images of the girl, taken between September 8 and November 14 of the previous year. The police discovered these images on his mobile phone after executing a search warrant at his home in Bingley. The court proceedings revealed that Booth’s actions were deemed a significant breach of trust and conduct expected of someone in his position.
During the hearing at Carlisle Crown Court, Booth pleaded guilty to three criminal offences related to the possession of indecent images. As part of his sentencing, he was given a three-month prison sentence for each offence, though these were suspended for two years. Additionally, he was placed under a two-year community order that includes supervision, and he will be reported to safeguarding authorities, effectively banning him from working with children and vulnerable adults in the future.
Judge Peter Hughes QC addressed Booth directly, stating, “The tragedy of this case is that you are unlikely to be able to work with children and work as a teacher for the foreseeable future.” The judge emphasized the gravity of Booth’s actions, describing them as “wholly inappropriate” and a “monumentally stupid course” of conduct. Despite the severity of the case, the judge took into account a background report and references supporting Booth, who is married with children and has a wife standing by him.
Prosecutor Beccy McGregor explained that during police interviews, Booth admitted that he and the girl had discussed meeting in person but never made any concrete arrangements. She also noted that Booth had admitted to feeling flattered and gaining sexual gratification from the exchanges. The girl involved expressed feelings of shame and embarrassment over having sent the photographs, underscoring the emotional toll of the incident.
Defence lawyer Greg Hoare acknowledged Booth’s mistake, describing it as a “monumentally stupid course” and stating that Booth had taken steps to prevent any recurrence of such behavior. He clarified that Booth had not yet been struck off as a teacher but would face a disciplinary hearing after the court proceedings. The court also heard that Booth, a man of previously good character, had received numerous references and was supported by his family, including his wife and children.
Judge Hughes concluded by condemning Booth’s conduct, stating, “In my judgement it has to be met by means of a sentence of imprisonment – that is the least that I think the community and caring parents would expect.” However, after considering a background report, the judge decided to suspend the prison sentence, recognizing Booth’s remorse and understanding of the seriousness of his actions. He emphasized that this incident was not merely a mistake but an infatuation, and expressed hope that Booth now comprehends the gravity of his misconduct.