STACY SCOTT FROM BLACKPOOL BANNED FOR 15 YEARS AFTER DOG SUFFERING CRUELTY IN PLATT STREET
| Red Rose Database
Blackpool Animal Abuser
A woman from Blackpool has been handed a severe 15-year ban from owning or keeping animals after she was found responsible for neglecting a dog, leading to the animal's suffering and deterioration. The incident came to light when authorities intervened at her residence on Platt Street, where the dog, a bull breed named Milo, was discovered in a dire state of neglect.
In October, local authority dog wardens removed Milo from Stacy Scott’s home following welfare concerns raised by the Blackpool Council. The dog was immediately taken into custody and examined by a veterinarian, revealing shocking signs of neglect. Milo was found with open wounds, hair loss, and a body condition score of only three out of nine, indicating severe malnutrition and poor health. His coat was in a deplorable state, with patches of hair loss known as alopecia, and bleeding wounds were evident on his body.
The veterinarian also observed that Milo’s eyes were partially closed and had discharge, suggesting ongoing pain and discomfort. The vet’s assessment confirmed that the dog had been subjected to prolonged suffering, with signs of distress and pain evident in his physical condition. The veterinarian stated, “I am certain this dog had suffered both pain and distress.”
Details emerged during the court proceedings that Milo had been in this neglected state for months. Stacy Scott, aged 48, admitted in court that Milo had a “sad face” and skin issues that persisted over an extended period. She acknowledged that she had failed to seek veterinary care for Milo earlier, citing financial constraints as the reason for not taking him to a vet. She admitted that Milo had never been to a veterinarian before his rescue.
Following the assessment and the evidence presented, the decision was made to euthanize Milo shortly after his rescue by the RSPCA, in order to prevent further suffering. The tragic case highlighted the neglect and failure to provide basic care, including adequate nutrition and veterinary treatment.
In court on Wednesday, February 26, at Preston Magistrates’ Court, Stacy Scott pleaded guilty to multiple charges, including failing to provide proper nutrition, neglecting veterinary needs, and not protecting her dog from suffering. Her guilty plea resulted in a comprehensive sentence that included a 15-year ban on owning animals, a 12-month community order, and 100 hours of unpaid work. Additionally, she was ordered to pay costs of £250 and a victim surcharge of £114.
The court also ruled that Scott would not be able to contest the animal ownership ban until 2035, effectively preventing her from owning animals for the foreseeable future. After the sentencing, RSPCA Inspector Carl Larsson expressed his disappointment, stating, “There were so many obvious signs of ill health which should have prompted Scott to seek veterinary advice. Most noticeable was Milo’s chronic skin condition, which had caused substantial fur loss and open wounds where he had bitten and scratched himself. Any reasonably competent owner would have sought the appropriate veterinary care for these issues, but Scott failed to do what was right by her dog and he suffered as a result.”
This case underscores the importance of responsible pet ownership and the need for vigilance in recognizing signs of animal neglect. Authorities in Blackpool remain committed to protecting animals from cruelty and ensuring that offenders are held accountable for their actions.
In October, local authority dog wardens removed Milo from Stacy Scott’s home following welfare concerns raised by the Blackpool Council. The dog was immediately taken into custody and examined by a veterinarian, revealing shocking signs of neglect. Milo was found with open wounds, hair loss, and a body condition score of only three out of nine, indicating severe malnutrition and poor health. His coat was in a deplorable state, with patches of hair loss known as alopecia, and bleeding wounds were evident on his body.
The veterinarian also observed that Milo’s eyes were partially closed and had discharge, suggesting ongoing pain and discomfort. The vet’s assessment confirmed that the dog had been subjected to prolonged suffering, with signs of distress and pain evident in his physical condition. The veterinarian stated, “I am certain this dog had suffered both pain and distress.”
Details emerged during the court proceedings that Milo had been in this neglected state for months. Stacy Scott, aged 48, admitted in court that Milo had a “sad face” and skin issues that persisted over an extended period. She acknowledged that she had failed to seek veterinary care for Milo earlier, citing financial constraints as the reason for not taking him to a vet. She admitted that Milo had never been to a veterinarian before his rescue.
Following the assessment and the evidence presented, the decision was made to euthanize Milo shortly after his rescue by the RSPCA, in order to prevent further suffering. The tragic case highlighted the neglect and failure to provide basic care, including adequate nutrition and veterinary treatment.
In court on Wednesday, February 26, at Preston Magistrates’ Court, Stacy Scott pleaded guilty to multiple charges, including failing to provide proper nutrition, neglecting veterinary needs, and not protecting her dog from suffering. Her guilty plea resulted in a comprehensive sentence that included a 15-year ban on owning animals, a 12-month community order, and 100 hours of unpaid work. Additionally, she was ordered to pay costs of £250 and a victim surcharge of £114.
The court also ruled that Scott would not be able to contest the animal ownership ban until 2035, effectively preventing her from owning animals for the foreseeable future. After the sentencing, RSPCA Inspector Carl Larsson expressed his disappointment, stating, “There were so many obvious signs of ill health which should have prompted Scott to seek veterinary advice. Most noticeable was Milo’s chronic skin condition, which had caused substantial fur loss and open wounds where he had bitten and scratched himself. Any reasonably competent owner would have sought the appropriate veterinary care for these issues, but Scott failed to do what was right by her dog and he suffered as a result.”
This case underscores the importance of responsible pet ownership and the need for vigilance in recognizing signs of animal neglect. Authorities in Blackpool remain committed to protecting animals from cruelty and ensuring that offenders are held accountable for their actions.