DONEGAL MAN SHAUN McCAHILL RAMELTON SHAKING BABY COURT
| Red Rose Database
Donegal Ramelton Sexual Abuser
In November 2013, a deeply disturbing case unfolded in Donegal involving Shaun McCahill, a 21-year-old man from Ramelton, who was brought before Letterkenny Circuit Court on serious charges related to the harm inflicted upon his infant daughter.
McCahill faced allegations of physically assaulting his nine-week-old baby girl, a defenseless and fragile child, in a manner that caused severe injuries. The court heard that on three separate occasions, he shook the infant in a brutal manner—twice with his hands and once while she was in her pram—actions that resulted in significant harm to her tiny body.
The incident that brought McCahill to court occurred on May 19, 2011, when he was caring for the child. According to Garda Joe McManus, the investigation revealed that the baby was placed on a sofa and was sleeping peacefully until she suddenly began to suffer convulsions. McCahill, in a panic, called an ambulance, and the child was rushed to Letterkenny General Hospital. Further medical examinations later revealed that the infant had sustained injuries that were not accidental, including cracked ribs and other trauma.
Subsequently, the child was transferred to Temple Street Children’s Hospital in Dublin, where doctors uncovered older injuries, confirming a pattern of ongoing harm. Social services and medical professionals conducted thorough examinations, concluding that the injuries were consistent with non-accidental trauma. During police interviews, McCahill admitted that he shook his daughter on three occasions because he could not stop her crying, a distressing confession that underscored the severity of the case.
Following his admission, McCahill was arrested and has since undergone comprehensive psychiatric evaluation and counseling. The court was also informed that he rarely leaves his home and has attempted to take his own life, highlighting his mental health struggles amid the ordeal.
During the proceedings, the court heard from the child's mother, who was invited to give evidence. When asked whether she believed her former boyfriend intended to hurt their daughter, she responded that she could not say. The judge in the case, Judge John O’Hagan, inquired about the possibility of McCahill having unsupervised access to his daughter in the future. The mother expressed uncertainty but confirmed that he currently has supervised visits when the child stays with his parents from Friday night to Sunday night.
Throughout the court session, McCahill sat with his face down and hands in his head, visibly distressed, while the child's mother was seen sobbing. His legal representative, Charlotte Simpson, emphasized that McCahill felt deeply ashamed and remorseful for his actions, asserting that he remains a good father at heart. She described him as someone who still considers the little girl his hero, noting that she runs to him and hugs him during her visits.
Judge O’Hagan, after considering all the evidence, made a decision that surprised many. He stated that he would not impose a custodial sentence, citing the lack of intent, the positive reports indicating a low risk of re-offending, and the strong bond between McCahill and his daughter. The judge acknowledged the emotional and tragic nature of the case, describing it as a situation where a young father, overwhelmed by stress and frustration, lost control. He remarked that McCahill, at just 21 years old, likely lacked sufficient experience in fatherhood, which contributed to his actions.
The judge also highlighted that McCahill would have to live with the social stigma and the knowledge that he caused his child's injuries every day. He referenced a psychiatric report that suggested there was no malicious intent behind the assaults. The court contemplated the difficult task McCahill might face in explaining his actions to his daughter in the future, should he ever regain unsupervised access.
Ultimately, Judge O’Hagan sentenced McCahill to a year in prison on each of the three counts, to run concurrently. However, he ordered that the prison term be replaced with 150 hours of community service, reflecting a belief in the potential for rehabilitation. As the court proceedings concluded, McCahill was seen crying, comforted by his parents, while the child's mother was consoled by friends. The case remains a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of unchecked stress and the importance of safeguarding vulnerable children in Donegal and Ramelton.
McCahill faced allegations of physically assaulting his nine-week-old baby girl, a defenseless and fragile child, in a manner that caused severe injuries. The court heard that on three separate occasions, he shook the infant in a brutal manner—twice with his hands and once while she was in her pram—actions that resulted in significant harm to her tiny body.
The incident that brought McCahill to court occurred on May 19, 2011, when he was caring for the child. According to Garda Joe McManus, the investigation revealed that the baby was placed on a sofa and was sleeping peacefully until she suddenly began to suffer convulsions. McCahill, in a panic, called an ambulance, and the child was rushed to Letterkenny General Hospital. Further medical examinations later revealed that the infant had sustained injuries that were not accidental, including cracked ribs and other trauma.
Subsequently, the child was transferred to Temple Street Children’s Hospital in Dublin, where doctors uncovered older injuries, confirming a pattern of ongoing harm. Social services and medical professionals conducted thorough examinations, concluding that the injuries were consistent with non-accidental trauma. During police interviews, McCahill admitted that he shook his daughter on three occasions because he could not stop her crying, a distressing confession that underscored the severity of the case.
Following his admission, McCahill was arrested and has since undergone comprehensive psychiatric evaluation and counseling. The court was also informed that he rarely leaves his home and has attempted to take his own life, highlighting his mental health struggles amid the ordeal.
During the proceedings, the court heard from the child's mother, who was invited to give evidence. When asked whether she believed her former boyfriend intended to hurt their daughter, she responded that she could not say. The judge in the case, Judge John O’Hagan, inquired about the possibility of McCahill having unsupervised access to his daughter in the future. The mother expressed uncertainty but confirmed that he currently has supervised visits when the child stays with his parents from Friday night to Sunday night.
Throughout the court session, McCahill sat with his face down and hands in his head, visibly distressed, while the child's mother was seen sobbing. His legal representative, Charlotte Simpson, emphasized that McCahill felt deeply ashamed and remorseful for his actions, asserting that he remains a good father at heart. She described him as someone who still considers the little girl his hero, noting that she runs to him and hugs him during her visits.
Judge O’Hagan, after considering all the evidence, made a decision that surprised many. He stated that he would not impose a custodial sentence, citing the lack of intent, the positive reports indicating a low risk of re-offending, and the strong bond between McCahill and his daughter. The judge acknowledged the emotional and tragic nature of the case, describing it as a situation where a young father, overwhelmed by stress and frustration, lost control. He remarked that McCahill, at just 21 years old, likely lacked sufficient experience in fatherhood, which contributed to his actions.
The judge also highlighted that McCahill would have to live with the social stigma and the knowledge that he caused his child's injuries every day. He referenced a psychiatric report that suggested there was no malicious intent behind the assaults. The court contemplated the difficult task McCahill might face in explaining his actions to his daughter in the future, should he ever regain unsupervised access.
Ultimately, Judge O’Hagan sentenced McCahill to a year in prison on each of the three counts, to run concurrently. However, he ordered that the prison term be replaced with 150 hours of community service, reflecting a belief in the potential for rehabilitation. As the court proceedings concluded, McCahill was seen crying, comforted by his parents, while the child's mother was consoled by friends. The case remains a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of unchecked stress and the importance of safeguarding vulnerable children in Donegal and Ramelton.