SADIE MORRIS FROM BARWELL SHOCKS LEICESTER AND NORTHAMPTON WITH SEXUAL ABUSE OF 3-YEAR-OLD GIRL
| Red Rose Database
Barwell Child Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has sent shockwaves through the communities of Barwell, Leicester, and Northampton, Sadie Morris, aged 24, was convicted of heinous crimes involving the sexual abuse of a young girl and the distribution of indecent images. The trial, held at Leicester Crown Court, revealed a series of deeply troubling acts committed by Morris, who had previously been known to reside in Barwell but was set to be relocated to Leicester or Bedford/Northampton areas following her release from custody.
The allegations against Morris came to light after police seized a Blackberry phone belonging to a man in North Wales during a search of his residence. The device contained a large collection of images and messages, some of which implicated Morris directly. The evidence showed that between July 1 and July 31, 2013, Morris engaged in the production and dissemination of explicit images involving a three-year-old girl, including photographs that depicted her naked and engaged in sexual acts with the child.
Morris was accused of posing naked with the young girl and sending these images from her Blackberry to a male acquaintance. The photographs included one of the most serious categories, a Category A image, which is classified as the most severe level of indecency. Additional images showed Morris engaging in sexual acts with the girl, and she was identified by a distinctive rose tattoo on her body. Police also noted that a ring Morris was wearing in some images closely resembled a ring worn by the individual in the photographs, further linking her to the abuse.
The court heard that Morris denied the charges, claiming that she only sent images of herself and had no involvement in taking or distributing indecent photographs of the child. She argued that her phone could have been accessed by others, suggesting that someone else might be responsible for the incriminating images. During her testimony, Morris stated she was 21 at the time, engaged to be married, and expressed regret over her actions, claiming she was experimenting with sending provocative images to strangers and that she did not intend to harm the child.
The jury, composed of seven men and five women, found Morris guilty of all charges after a trial that uncovered what the judge described as 'overwhelming evidence.' The verdict was delivered in July, and Morris was subsequently sentenced to five years in prison by Judge Nicholas Dean. The judge emphasized the seriousness of the offenses, noting that Morris had not shown remorse and had not acknowledged her guilt despite the compelling evidence.
During the sentencing, Judge Dean highlighted the gravity of the crime, particularly the assault by penetration of a child under 13, which he described as a very serious offense. He pointed out that Morris was not unintelligent and was aware of the severity of her actions. The judge also mentioned that the three-year-old victim had made statements that were consistent with being abused, although these were not used as direct evidence in court.
The case also revealed that Morris had no prior convictions but had previously received a reprimand for a similar type of activity, indicating a pattern of concerning behavior. As Morris was led out of the court, she showed no visible emotion but glanced once at the public gallery. The victim's mother, visibly distressed, shouted from the courtroom: 'I want to look her straight in the eyes. I hate you Sadie. I hope you rot in jail. You fat cow.' Her words reflected the community's outrage and the profound impact of the crimes.
This case underscores the ongoing challenges law enforcement faces in combating child exploitation and the importance of vigilance in protecting vulnerable victims. The authorities continue to investigate the extent of Morris's activities and the potential involvement of others, emphasizing the need for continued awareness and preventative measures in such disturbing cases.
The allegations against Morris came to light after police seized a Blackberry phone belonging to a man in North Wales during a search of his residence. The device contained a large collection of images and messages, some of which implicated Morris directly. The evidence showed that between July 1 and July 31, 2013, Morris engaged in the production and dissemination of explicit images involving a three-year-old girl, including photographs that depicted her naked and engaged in sexual acts with the child.
Morris was accused of posing naked with the young girl and sending these images from her Blackberry to a male acquaintance. The photographs included one of the most serious categories, a Category A image, which is classified as the most severe level of indecency. Additional images showed Morris engaging in sexual acts with the girl, and she was identified by a distinctive rose tattoo on her body. Police also noted that a ring Morris was wearing in some images closely resembled a ring worn by the individual in the photographs, further linking her to the abuse.
The court heard that Morris denied the charges, claiming that she only sent images of herself and had no involvement in taking or distributing indecent photographs of the child. She argued that her phone could have been accessed by others, suggesting that someone else might be responsible for the incriminating images. During her testimony, Morris stated she was 21 at the time, engaged to be married, and expressed regret over her actions, claiming she was experimenting with sending provocative images to strangers and that she did not intend to harm the child.
The jury, composed of seven men and five women, found Morris guilty of all charges after a trial that uncovered what the judge described as 'overwhelming evidence.' The verdict was delivered in July, and Morris was subsequently sentenced to five years in prison by Judge Nicholas Dean. The judge emphasized the seriousness of the offenses, noting that Morris had not shown remorse and had not acknowledged her guilt despite the compelling evidence.
During the sentencing, Judge Dean highlighted the gravity of the crime, particularly the assault by penetration of a child under 13, which he described as a very serious offense. He pointed out that Morris was not unintelligent and was aware of the severity of her actions. The judge also mentioned that the three-year-old victim had made statements that were consistent with being abused, although these were not used as direct evidence in court.
The case also revealed that Morris had no prior convictions but had previously received a reprimand for a similar type of activity, indicating a pattern of concerning behavior. As Morris was led out of the court, she showed no visible emotion but glanced once at the public gallery. The victim's mother, visibly distressed, shouted from the courtroom: 'I want to look her straight in the eyes. I hate you Sadie. I hope you rot in jail. You fat cow.' Her words reflected the community's outrage and the profound impact of the crimes.
This case underscores the ongoing challenges law enforcement faces in combating child exploitation and the importance of vigilance in protecting vulnerable victims. The authorities continue to investigate the extent of Morris's activities and the potential involvement of others, emphasizing the need for continued awareness and preventative measures in such disturbing cases.