ROBERT WARDEN FROM LITTLEHAMPTON CONVICTED OF SEXUAL OFFENSES AGAINST 14-YEAR-OLD NEAR HONITON
| Red Rose Database
Littlehampton Child Sexual Abuser
In June 2022, a disturbing incident unfolded involving Robert Warden, a 72-year-old man from Littlehampton, who was accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl near Honiton. The case drew significant attention as Warden was found guilty of engaging in inappropriate and sexual behavior towards the young girl during a visit to a residence close to Honiton.
According to court proceedings, Warden made explicit and unwelcome advances towards the teenage girl, who was visiting the house at the time. The girl, whose identity remains protected, recounted that Warden had touched her breasts over her clothing and then attempted to slide his hand under her top, taking advantage of her shock and distress. Despite her efforts to push him away, Warden persisted, making a 'pathetic pleading expression' and begging her to allow him to continue his inappropriate conduct. He reportedly told her to let him touch her again, which added to the trauma she experienced.
During the trial, Warden attempted to deny the allegations, claiming that the entire incident was fabricated. However, the victim's account remained consistent throughout, and her truthful disclosure was supported by evidence presented in court. The judge, Judge David Evans, emphasized that her statement was straightforward, clear, and credible, especially given the immediate impact the incident had on her. The judge pointed out that her consistent testimony contrasted sharply with Warden's conflicting and contradictory explanations, which he had given to different people at different times.
Judge Evans described Warden's portrayal of himself as a 'tipsy old man' as an attempt to diminish his responsibility. He condemned Warden's actions as obscene and deliberate, highlighting that the defendant had chosen to touch the girl inappropriately and then sought to exploit her shock by attempting further contact. The judge remarked that Warden's behavior was a clear violation of her trust and personal boundaries.
Warden's defense included claims that he was under the influence of alcohol at the time, but the court found his denial unconvincing. The jury convicted him of sexual activity with a child in May, and Warden appeared before Exeter Crown Court for sentencing. The judge sentenced him to a six-month suspended prison term, meaning he would not serve immediate jail time but would be required to complete 140 hours of unpaid work and pay costs amounting to £2,400.
The impact of the incident on the victim has been profound. She issued a statement revealing that she has struggled with her mental health since the assault. She expressed fears about being believed and shared that she has become less confident and more wary of men, which has significantly affected her social interactions and trust in others. Her experience underscores the lasting emotional scars caused by such offenses and highlights the importance of justice and support for victims of sexual abuse.
According to court proceedings, Warden made explicit and unwelcome advances towards the teenage girl, who was visiting the house at the time. The girl, whose identity remains protected, recounted that Warden had touched her breasts over her clothing and then attempted to slide his hand under her top, taking advantage of her shock and distress. Despite her efforts to push him away, Warden persisted, making a 'pathetic pleading expression' and begging her to allow him to continue his inappropriate conduct. He reportedly told her to let him touch her again, which added to the trauma she experienced.
During the trial, Warden attempted to deny the allegations, claiming that the entire incident was fabricated. However, the victim's account remained consistent throughout, and her truthful disclosure was supported by evidence presented in court. The judge, Judge David Evans, emphasized that her statement was straightforward, clear, and credible, especially given the immediate impact the incident had on her. The judge pointed out that her consistent testimony contrasted sharply with Warden's conflicting and contradictory explanations, which he had given to different people at different times.
Judge Evans described Warden's portrayal of himself as a 'tipsy old man' as an attempt to diminish his responsibility. He condemned Warden's actions as obscene and deliberate, highlighting that the defendant had chosen to touch the girl inappropriately and then sought to exploit her shock by attempting further contact. The judge remarked that Warden's behavior was a clear violation of her trust and personal boundaries.
Warden's defense included claims that he was under the influence of alcohol at the time, but the court found his denial unconvincing. The jury convicted him of sexual activity with a child in May, and Warden appeared before Exeter Crown Court for sentencing. The judge sentenced him to a six-month suspended prison term, meaning he would not serve immediate jail time but would be required to complete 140 hours of unpaid work and pay costs amounting to £2,400.
The impact of the incident on the victim has been profound. She issued a statement revealing that she has struggled with her mental health since the assault. She expressed fears about being believed and shared that she has become less confident and more wary of men, which has significantly affected her social interactions and trust in others. Her experience underscores the lasting emotional scars caused by such offenses and highlights the importance of justice and support for victims of sexual abuse.