ROB SPENCE BRIGHTON CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CAUTION DESPITE ADMISSION
| Red Rose Database
Brighton Sexual Abuser
In March 2012, a troubling case emerged involving Rob Spence, a 47-year-old man from Brighton, who faced serious allegations related to the possession of child pornography. Spence, who was employed as a driver within the CityClean department of Brighton and Hove City Council, was arrested on suspicion of possessing indecent images of children. Following his arrest in October, Spence admitted to police that he possessed such illicit material, a confession that led to significant but controversial legal consequences.
Despite the gravity of the allegations, Spence was not criminally prosecuted. Instead, authorities decided to issue him a police caution, a decision that has sparked concern among local residents and colleagues. As part of this process, Spence was placed on the sex offenders’ register for a period of two years, allowing law enforcement to monitor his activities closely during this time. However, he was not charged with a criminal offense, a move that has raised questions about the handling of his case.
Following his arrest, Spence continued working for CityClean as a driver for some time. It was only later that he resigned from his position, officially stepping down on January 22. A former coworker expressed unease about the situation, stating, “We were told he had quit because he had been arrested for possessing child pornography. My concern is that he was working with the public and he lives near two schools, but by being let off with a caution, no one knows what he has done.”
Law enforcement officials explained that the decision to issue a caution was based on their review of the evidence, which they deemed insufficient for criminal prosecution but enough to warrant a caution. A police spokeswoman clarified, “After reviewing the evidence available it was considered that a caution was the most suitable option available. Every such report is fully investigated in the interest of protecting children but each case has to be dealt with on its own individual merits. This is an unusual but not unprecedented outcome which is allowed for in caution guidance.”
Meanwhile, a council spokesperson confirmed that Rob Spence resigned from his role on January 22, but the case continues to evoke concern regarding the safety and oversight of individuals working in public-facing roles within Brighton.
Despite the gravity of the allegations, Spence was not criminally prosecuted. Instead, authorities decided to issue him a police caution, a decision that has sparked concern among local residents and colleagues. As part of this process, Spence was placed on the sex offenders’ register for a period of two years, allowing law enforcement to monitor his activities closely during this time. However, he was not charged with a criminal offense, a move that has raised questions about the handling of his case.
Following his arrest, Spence continued working for CityClean as a driver for some time. It was only later that he resigned from his position, officially stepping down on January 22. A former coworker expressed unease about the situation, stating, “We were told he had quit because he had been arrested for possessing child pornography. My concern is that he was working with the public and he lives near two schools, but by being let off with a caution, no one knows what he has done.”
Law enforcement officials explained that the decision to issue a caution was based on their review of the evidence, which they deemed insufficient for criminal prosecution but enough to warrant a caution. A police spokeswoman clarified, “After reviewing the evidence available it was considered that a caution was the most suitable option available. Every such report is fully investigated in the interest of protecting children but each case has to be dealt with on its own individual merits. This is an unusual but not unprecedented outcome which is allowed for in caution guidance.”
Meanwhile, a council spokesperson confirmed that Rob Spence resigned from his role on January 22, but the case continues to evoke concern regarding the safety and oversight of individuals working in public-facing roles within Brighton.