RICHARD SWEET FROM SHEFFIELD ADMITS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGES IN COURT
| Red Rose Database
Sheffield Child Sexual Abuser
In February 2003, a serious case involving a former police officer from Sheffield came to light, revealing disturbing details about his involvement in child exploitation material. Richard Sweet, aged 49, who previously served as a traffic policeman with the South Yorkshire police force, admitted to engaging in the exchange of explicit images depicting children engaged in sexual acts. The exchanges took place with an individual from Northern Ireland, highlighting the cross-regional nature of this criminal activity.
Sweet's actions came to the attention of authorities after a member of the public reported seeing indecent images of children appearing in an internet chat room. This tip-off prompted a police investigation that eventually led to Sweet being tracked down and questioned. It was revealed during the Hull Crown Court proceedings that Sweet had deleted the disc containing the illicit images approximately twelve months prior to police questioning, attempting to conceal his activities. Despite this, investigators managed to establish his involvement.
The court heard that Sweet had exchanged these images with a man from Northern Ireland, who was subsequently arrested and is currently serving a three-year prison sentence. Sweet himself pleaded guilty to charges of making eight indecent images of children. Additionally, he admitted to distributing an indecent image of a child via email and requested that six other related charges be taken into account during sentencing.
Throughout the proceedings, Sweet’s legal representative, barrister Richard Barradell, emphasized that the former officer had been married and maintained an unblemished record during his 24 years of service with the police. However, upon the discovery of his offences, Sweet was dismissed from the force. The court sentenced him to a three-year community rehabilitation order, which includes mandatory sex offender counseling. Furthermore, Judge Mr Justice Andrew Smith ordered Sweet to sign the National Sex Offenders Register for a period of five years and to inform police of any change of address, underscoring the seriousness of his crimes and the ongoing monitoring required.
In a decision reflecting the court’s view of his remorse and prior conduct, Judge Smith stated that Sweet would not face imprisonment, noting that he had turned away from child pornography before his offences were uncovered. This case highlights the ongoing efforts of law enforcement to combat online child exploitation and the importance of community vigilance in reporting suspicious activity.
Sweet's actions came to the attention of authorities after a member of the public reported seeing indecent images of children appearing in an internet chat room. This tip-off prompted a police investigation that eventually led to Sweet being tracked down and questioned. It was revealed during the Hull Crown Court proceedings that Sweet had deleted the disc containing the illicit images approximately twelve months prior to police questioning, attempting to conceal his activities. Despite this, investigators managed to establish his involvement.
The court heard that Sweet had exchanged these images with a man from Northern Ireland, who was subsequently arrested and is currently serving a three-year prison sentence. Sweet himself pleaded guilty to charges of making eight indecent images of children. Additionally, he admitted to distributing an indecent image of a child via email and requested that six other related charges be taken into account during sentencing.
Throughout the proceedings, Sweet’s legal representative, barrister Richard Barradell, emphasized that the former officer had been married and maintained an unblemished record during his 24 years of service with the police. However, upon the discovery of his offences, Sweet was dismissed from the force. The court sentenced him to a three-year community rehabilitation order, which includes mandatory sex offender counseling. Furthermore, Judge Mr Justice Andrew Smith ordered Sweet to sign the National Sex Offenders Register for a period of five years and to inform police of any change of address, underscoring the seriousness of his crimes and the ongoing monitoring required.
In a decision reflecting the court’s view of his remorse and prior conduct, Judge Smith stated that Sweet would not face imprisonment, noting that he had turned away from child pornography before his offences were uncovered. This case highlights the ongoing efforts of law enforcement to combat online child exploitation and the importance of community vigilance in reporting suspicious activity.