RAPHAEL FARINA'S SHOCKING CHILD ABUSE IMAGE SCANDAL IN DUBLIN
| Red Rose Database
Dublin Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has sent shockwaves through Dublin, Raphael Farina, a 67-year-old former senior administrative officer at the Central Bank, was initially convicted of possessing an enormous cache of child abuse images, with authorities uncovering up to 700,000 files on various media devices. The investigation, which was part of an international effort involving Bavarian police in Germany, led to a search of Farina’s residence in Dublin in 2007. During the search, authorities discovered a staggering number of files, including thousands of images and videos depicting the sexual abuse of young children, some of which involved infants and toddlers.
Farina was arrested and charged with three counts of possession of child abuse images. At his trial in February 2011 at the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court, the prosecution presented evidence that included CDs, DVDs, and computer discs containing the illicit material. Detective Garda Gerard Keane, a computer forensic expert, testified that some files bore descriptive names and graphic content, with over 10,000 images found on his home computer alone. The files also contained instructions on how to avoid detection by paedophile groups, highlighting the disturbing nature of the material.
During police interviews, Farina admitted to downloading child pornography for a decade, claiming he had thousands of images. When authorities searched his apartment, he handed over a box filled with CDs and DVDs, reportedly stating, “there is no point denying it.” He explained that the material had been kept at his workplace and that he had taken it home the previous day, denying any involvement in downloading the content at work. Farina also claimed that his interest was driven by a fascination with decrypting coded files, which he described as an obsession.
Despite the gravity of the evidence, Farina’s legal team did not contest the charges directly but challenged the validity of the search warrant used to seize the evidence. The warrant was found to be incorrectly dated, which led the Court of Criminal Appeal to overturn his conviction. The appellate court ruled that the warrant was invalid and, consequently, the search and subsequent evidence collection could not be legally justified. As a result, Farina was released, and his four-year prison sentence was quashed. The court emphasized that the warrant’s flaw rendered the entire case legally invalid, and Farina was free to walk away from the charges.
It is noteworthy that Farina, who has no prior criminal record, had worked at the Central Bank since the early 1960s and retired immediately following his arrest. His personal life has also been touched by separation; he parted ways with his wife four years prior to his arrest and is now involved with a partner in Thailand, with whom he has a child. The case has raised serious questions about the procedures used in the investigation and the importance of proper legal protocols in handling sensitive evidence related to child exploitation.
Farina was arrested and charged with three counts of possession of child abuse images. At his trial in February 2011 at the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court, the prosecution presented evidence that included CDs, DVDs, and computer discs containing the illicit material. Detective Garda Gerard Keane, a computer forensic expert, testified that some files bore descriptive names and graphic content, with over 10,000 images found on his home computer alone. The files also contained instructions on how to avoid detection by paedophile groups, highlighting the disturbing nature of the material.
During police interviews, Farina admitted to downloading child pornography for a decade, claiming he had thousands of images. When authorities searched his apartment, he handed over a box filled with CDs and DVDs, reportedly stating, “there is no point denying it.” He explained that the material had been kept at his workplace and that he had taken it home the previous day, denying any involvement in downloading the content at work. Farina also claimed that his interest was driven by a fascination with decrypting coded files, which he described as an obsession.
Despite the gravity of the evidence, Farina’s legal team did not contest the charges directly but challenged the validity of the search warrant used to seize the evidence. The warrant was found to be incorrectly dated, which led the Court of Criminal Appeal to overturn his conviction. The appellate court ruled that the warrant was invalid and, consequently, the search and subsequent evidence collection could not be legally justified. As a result, Farina was released, and his four-year prison sentence was quashed. The court emphasized that the warrant’s flaw rendered the entire case legally invalid, and Farina was free to walk away from the charges.
It is noteworthy that Farina, who has no prior criminal record, had worked at the Central Bank since the early 1960s and retired immediately following his arrest. His personal life has also been touched by separation; he parted ways with his wife four years prior to his arrest and is now involved with a partner in Thailand, with whom he has a child. The case has raised serious questions about the procedures used in the investigation and the importance of proper legal protocols in handling sensitive evidence related to child exploitation.