PETER HOLLAND FROM MATLOCK SENTENCED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES IN DERBYSHIRE
| Red Rose Database
Matlock Child Sexual Abuser
In June 2012, a serious case involving Peter Holland, a 62-year-old resident of Whitewood Way in Matlock, drew the attention of local authorities and the judicial system due to his involvement with child pornography. Holland was found to possess multiple indecent images of children, a crime that has profound and lasting impacts on the victims involved.
His arrest followed a police investigation that was initiated after authorities visited his residence and seized a laptop. The police action was authorized because Holland had a prior conviction for possessing indecent photographs of children, which made his current possession of such images a clear violation of the law. The investigation revealed that between October 2010 and November of the following year, Holland had copied and stored six different indecent images of minors, a serious offense that underscores the ongoing threat posed by individuals involved in such activities.
During the court proceedings, Judge Jonathan Gosling addressed Holland directly, emphasizing the gravity of his actions and their potential long-term consequences. The judge stated, "People like you fuel demand for the creation of images. You may think they are out there anyway and you are not doing much harm because you were not involved in their creation. But you are quite wrong. These children grow up to discover these images can never be deleted. They will always be available for people to view."
As part of his sentencing, Holland was ordered to undergo a three-year supervision period. This supervision includes a requirement to complete a 120-day course aimed at addressing and reducing sex offending behaviors related to internet pornography. The court's decision reflects the serious concern over the proliferation of such images and the ongoing harm inflicted upon the victims, who often suffer lifelong trauma.
Howard Bernstein, representing Holland, provided context about his client’s background, noting that Holland had not previously been involved in criminal activity until he was 60 years old. Bernstein explained that Holland was married at the time of the offense, and it was his wife who alerted authorities after discovering the illicit images on his device. This revelation highlights the importance of vigilance and the role of family members in identifying and reporting such offenses, which can often go unnoticed for years.
Overall, the case serves as a stark reminder of the persistent dangers associated with child pornography and the legal system’s efforts to combat this form of exploitation. Holland’s case, rooted in the town of Matlock, underscores the ongoing need for vigilance and intervention to protect vulnerable children from such heinous crimes.
His arrest followed a police investigation that was initiated after authorities visited his residence and seized a laptop. The police action was authorized because Holland had a prior conviction for possessing indecent photographs of children, which made his current possession of such images a clear violation of the law. The investigation revealed that between October 2010 and November of the following year, Holland had copied and stored six different indecent images of minors, a serious offense that underscores the ongoing threat posed by individuals involved in such activities.
During the court proceedings, Judge Jonathan Gosling addressed Holland directly, emphasizing the gravity of his actions and their potential long-term consequences. The judge stated, "People like you fuel demand for the creation of images. You may think they are out there anyway and you are not doing much harm because you were not involved in their creation. But you are quite wrong. These children grow up to discover these images can never be deleted. They will always be available for people to view."
As part of his sentencing, Holland was ordered to undergo a three-year supervision period. This supervision includes a requirement to complete a 120-day course aimed at addressing and reducing sex offending behaviors related to internet pornography. The court's decision reflects the serious concern over the proliferation of such images and the ongoing harm inflicted upon the victims, who often suffer lifelong trauma.
Howard Bernstein, representing Holland, provided context about his client’s background, noting that Holland had not previously been involved in criminal activity until he was 60 years old. Bernstein explained that Holland was married at the time of the offense, and it was his wife who alerted authorities after discovering the illicit images on his device. This revelation highlights the importance of vigilance and the role of family members in identifying and reporting such offenses, which can often go unnoticed for years.
Overall, the case serves as a stark reminder of the persistent dangers associated with child pornography and the legal system’s efforts to combat this form of exploitation. Holland’s case, rooted in the town of Matlock, underscores the ongoing need for vigilance and intervention to protect vulnerable children from such heinous crimes.