PETER GILL FROM SLALY ESCAPES JAIL AGAIN AFTER SECOND CHILD SEX ABUSE IMAGE SCANDAL NEAR HEXHAM
| Red Rose Database
Slaley Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has once again highlighted the ongoing issue of child exploitation, Peter Gill, a pensioner from Slaley, near Hexham, has narrowly avoided imprisonment after being found in possession of disturbing child sexual abuse images for the second time within a span of five years.
Back in 2017, Gill, then 66 years old, received a suspended prison sentence after authorities uncovered a disturbing collection of indecent images of minors stored on his electronic devices. Despite this previous conviction and being subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order, Gill's offending behavior persisted.
In June 2023, a routine police check led to the discovery of further heinous material on one of Gill’s memory cards. The police found additional images and a video that were classified as highly disturbing. This prompted a detailed investigation, which revealed that Gill had downloaded 19 more images between March and April of the previous year. Among these, one was classified as Category A, indicating the most serious level of abuse, involving a child estimated to be between nine and eleven years old. The remaining 18 images fell into Category C, involving children aged between seven and nine. Additionally, police found a prohibited animated video depicting a child aged between four and six.
During court proceedings at Newcastle Crown Court, it was revealed that Gill was now beginning to understand the nature of his offending and the triggers behind his behavior. He had also taken steps to seek help from the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, a charity dedicated to preventing child sexual abuse. Despite his efforts, Gill pleaded guilty to two counts of making an indecent image of a child and one count of possessing a prohibited image of a child.
Judge Edward Bindloss presided over the case and sentenced Gill to four months in prison, suspended for 18 months. The judge explained his decision, stating, “The question for me is, do I sentence you to prison for four months or suspend it and make an order? I have decided that a short prison sentence without any intervention work afterwards isn’t in the public interest here, and I’m going to suspend the sentence.”
It was also noted that Gill had previously received an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months, in May 2017, after being convicted of downloading indecent images of children. At that time, he was also placed under a Sexual Harm Prevention Order. However, his continued offending demonstrated a troubling pattern, with the latest offenses occurring despite these measures.
As part of his sentence, Gill was ordered to sign the Sex Offenders’ Register for seven years and was subjected to the Sexual Harm Prevention Order for the same period. The case underscores the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in monitoring and managing individuals with a history of such offenses, especially when previous interventions have failed to prevent further offending.
Back in 2017, Gill, then 66 years old, received a suspended prison sentence after authorities uncovered a disturbing collection of indecent images of minors stored on his electronic devices. Despite this previous conviction and being subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order, Gill's offending behavior persisted.
In June 2023, a routine police check led to the discovery of further heinous material on one of Gill’s memory cards. The police found additional images and a video that were classified as highly disturbing. This prompted a detailed investigation, which revealed that Gill had downloaded 19 more images between March and April of the previous year. Among these, one was classified as Category A, indicating the most serious level of abuse, involving a child estimated to be between nine and eleven years old. The remaining 18 images fell into Category C, involving children aged between seven and nine. Additionally, police found a prohibited animated video depicting a child aged between four and six.
During court proceedings at Newcastle Crown Court, it was revealed that Gill was now beginning to understand the nature of his offending and the triggers behind his behavior. He had also taken steps to seek help from the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, a charity dedicated to preventing child sexual abuse. Despite his efforts, Gill pleaded guilty to two counts of making an indecent image of a child and one count of possessing a prohibited image of a child.
Judge Edward Bindloss presided over the case and sentenced Gill to four months in prison, suspended for 18 months. The judge explained his decision, stating, “The question for me is, do I sentence you to prison for four months or suspend it and make an order? I have decided that a short prison sentence without any intervention work afterwards isn’t in the public interest here, and I’m going to suspend the sentence.”
It was also noted that Gill had previously received an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months, in May 2017, after being convicted of downloading indecent images of children. At that time, he was also placed under a Sexual Harm Prevention Order. However, his continued offending demonstrated a troubling pattern, with the latest offenses occurring despite these measures.
As part of his sentence, Gill was ordered to sign the Sex Offenders’ Register for seven years and was subjected to the Sexual Harm Prevention Order for the same period. The case underscores the ongoing challenges faced by authorities in monitoring and managing individuals with a history of such offenses, especially when previous interventions have failed to prevent further offending.