PAUL WOODRUFF: MIDDLESBROUGH CHILD RAPIST AND EXTREME PORNOGRAPHY OFFENDER CAUGHT IN FERRYHILL
| Red Rose Database
Middlesbrough Rapist
In a disturbing case that has sent shockwaves through the Middlesbrough community, Paul Woodruff, a known sex offender with a long and troubling history, was recently discovered in possession of highly disturbing material at his residence in Ferryhill. This incident occurred just months after he completed a lengthy prison sentence and was still under the supervision of authorities.
Woodruff, aged 54 and residing on Durham Road in Ferryhill, was identified as a high-risk sex offender due to his past convictions and the nature of his recent activities. The police visited his home on July 31 of the previous year as part of a routine “high risk review” conducted by a police offender manager. During this visit, authorities sought to assess his compliance with the conditions of his release and to monitor his activities.
Initially, Woodruff denied owning a laptop when questioned by officers. However, a subsequent search revealed the presence of a device that raised immediate concern. The hard drive of this device contained several alarming search terms, including references to “boy scout uniform” and “adult baby,” which suggested a troubling interest in specific fetishes and potentially illegal material. The police seized the device for further examination.
Upon detailed inspection, investigators uncovered a collection of male pornography, along with 89 images depicting bestiality involving adult women and animals. The discovery of such material was deeply troubling, especially considering Woodruff’s history and the nature of his previous offenses. Police also found a mobile phone hidden within another electronic device, and it is believed that another hard drive, possibly containing additional illicit content, was not recovered during the search.
Throughout the investigation, Woodruff maintained a notably secretive attitude regarding his electronic devices. When questioned about ownership, he confirmed that he was the sole user of the computer but offered no further cooperation. His responses and behavior during the police interview heightened concerns about the extent of his activities and the potential for further illegal material.
The authorities expressed significant concern over some of the images and search terms, indicating a possible ongoing effort by Woodruff to source or access more extreme content. There was also uncertainty about whether some of the material could be classified as “indecent,” which could have legal implications depending on the specific content involved.
In court, Woodruff faced a charge of possession of extreme pornography, to which he pleaded guilty for the period between May and July 2014. The prosecution highlighted that, although no indecent images of children were found during this recent incident, the material recovered was nonetheless highly concerning and perverted. The case was further complicated by Woodruff’s quick re-offense following his release from prison.
During the hearing, Eric Watson, representing Woodruff, described the case as “unpleasant” and emphasized that no child images were discovered. He acknowledged the disturbing nature of the images found but pointed out that Woodruff had not been involved in criminal activity related to child exploitation in this instance. Watson also noted that Woodruff’s re-offense shortly after his release was unfortunate.
Judge Andrew Stubbs sentenced Woodruff to eight months in prison for the possession of extreme pornography. In his remarks, the judge expressed grave concern about Woodruff’s background, especially considering how soon after his release from an 11-year sentence the recent offenses occurred. The judge criticized Woodruff’s uncooperative attitude during police questioning and the disturbing search terms found on his devices. Despite the seriousness of the case, the judge hoped that upon his release, Woodruff would pose less of a threat to the public.
Woodruff’s criminal history is extensive. In April 2003, he was convicted of child rape and indecent assault, which led to an 11-year prison sentence. During that trial, police uncovered videos and images at his Middlesbrough home, including a specially made video for a London scout master known as “Uncle David.” His barrister at the time described his behavior as “pathetic” and likened his addiction to a drug.
Following his conviction, Woodruff and his mother were evicted from their council house on the Brambles Farm estate after a former scout, now aged 20, reported him to the police. His crimes included the rape and indecent assault of a 13-year-old scout, as well as other assaults on young boys aged 11 and 13. He pleaded guilty to multiple charges, including making indecent photographs of children between 1995 and 1997.
Woodruff’s previous sentence was ten years for rape, with an additional year for child pornography offenses. He was also banned from working with children for life and required to register as a sex offender permanently. During police interviews, he admitted to befriending the victim, who is now an adult, but denied any sexual misconduct.
This case underscores the ongoing risks posed by individuals with a history of sexual offenses, especially those who re-offend shortly after their release. Authorities continue to work closely with child protection units and law enforcement agencies across Middlesbrough and London to monitor Woodruff’s activities and prevent further harm.
Woodruff, aged 54 and residing on Durham Road in Ferryhill, was identified as a high-risk sex offender due to his past convictions and the nature of his recent activities. The police visited his home on July 31 of the previous year as part of a routine “high risk review” conducted by a police offender manager. During this visit, authorities sought to assess his compliance with the conditions of his release and to monitor his activities.
Initially, Woodruff denied owning a laptop when questioned by officers. However, a subsequent search revealed the presence of a device that raised immediate concern. The hard drive of this device contained several alarming search terms, including references to “boy scout uniform” and “adult baby,” which suggested a troubling interest in specific fetishes and potentially illegal material. The police seized the device for further examination.
Upon detailed inspection, investigators uncovered a collection of male pornography, along with 89 images depicting bestiality involving adult women and animals. The discovery of such material was deeply troubling, especially considering Woodruff’s history and the nature of his previous offenses. Police also found a mobile phone hidden within another electronic device, and it is believed that another hard drive, possibly containing additional illicit content, was not recovered during the search.
Throughout the investigation, Woodruff maintained a notably secretive attitude regarding his electronic devices. When questioned about ownership, he confirmed that he was the sole user of the computer but offered no further cooperation. His responses and behavior during the police interview heightened concerns about the extent of his activities and the potential for further illegal material.
The authorities expressed significant concern over some of the images and search terms, indicating a possible ongoing effort by Woodruff to source or access more extreme content. There was also uncertainty about whether some of the material could be classified as “indecent,” which could have legal implications depending on the specific content involved.
In court, Woodruff faced a charge of possession of extreme pornography, to which he pleaded guilty for the period between May and July 2014. The prosecution highlighted that, although no indecent images of children were found during this recent incident, the material recovered was nonetheless highly concerning and perverted. The case was further complicated by Woodruff’s quick re-offense following his release from prison.
During the hearing, Eric Watson, representing Woodruff, described the case as “unpleasant” and emphasized that no child images were discovered. He acknowledged the disturbing nature of the images found but pointed out that Woodruff had not been involved in criminal activity related to child exploitation in this instance. Watson also noted that Woodruff’s re-offense shortly after his release was unfortunate.
Judge Andrew Stubbs sentenced Woodruff to eight months in prison for the possession of extreme pornography. In his remarks, the judge expressed grave concern about Woodruff’s background, especially considering how soon after his release from an 11-year sentence the recent offenses occurred. The judge criticized Woodruff’s uncooperative attitude during police questioning and the disturbing search terms found on his devices. Despite the seriousness of the case, the judge hoped that upon his release, Woodruff would pose less of a threat to the public.
Woodruff’s criminal history is extensive. In April 2003, he was convicted of child rape and indecent assault, which led to an 11-year prison sentence. During that trial, police uncovered videos and images at his Middlesbrough home, including a specially made video for a London scout master known as “Uncle David.” His barrister at the time described his behavior as “pathetic” and likened his addiction to a drug.
Following his conviction, Woodruff and his mother were evicted from their council house on the Brambles Farm estate after a former scout, now aged 20, reported him to the police. His crimes included the rape and indecent assault of a 13-year-old scout, as well as other assaults on young boys aged 11 and 13. He pleaded guilty to multiple charges, including making indecent photographs of children between 1995 and 1997.
Woodruff’s previous sentence was ten years for rape, with an additional year for child pornography offenses. He was also banned from working with children for life and required to register as a sex offender permanently. During police interviews, he admitted to befriending the victim, who is now an adult, but denied any sexual misconduct.
This case underscores the ongoing risks posed by individuals with a history of sexual offenses, especially those who re-offend shortly after their release. Authorities continue to work closely with child protection units and law enforcement agencies across Middlesbrough and London to monitor Woodruff’s activities and prevent further harm.