PAUL HARRIS CHATHAM MAN SENTENCED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES IN KENT
| Red Rose Database
Chatham Sexual Abuser
In May 2008, a man from Chatham was sentenced to prison after being found guilty of downloading child abuse images. Paul Harris, a 44-year-old resident of Boundary Road in Chatham, faced the court on charges related to the possession and distribution of illegal material involving minors.
During the hearing, Harris was presented with a stark choice by the presiding judge, Jeremy Carey: either serve a prison sentence or be released on the condition that he undergo treatment through a sex offender rehabilitation program. The court emphasized the seriousness of his actions and the need for appropriate punishment.
Judge Carey expressed his understanding of Harris’s apparent desire for help, stating, “I have no doubt you genuinely want some assistance, but in the circumstances the court must impose an immediate custodial sentence.” He further explained that the severity of the offending, coupled with Harris’s prior criminal record, left no room for alternative sentencing options.
“The reason for that is the level of offending and degree of culpability is such that I cannot responsibly or properly take another course,” the judge declared. He underscored the importance of sending a clear message to the community and offenders alike that such criminal behavior, especially involving minors, will result in imprisonment. The court’s decision reflects the gravity with which the justice system treats crimes of this nature, particularly when committed by individuals with previous convictions for similar offenses.
During the hearing, Harris was presented with a stark choice by the presiding judge, Jeremy Carey: either serve a prison sentence or be released on the condition that he undergo treatment through a sex offender rehabilitation program. The court emphasized the seriousness of his actions and the need for appropriate punishment.
Judge Carey expressed his understanding of Harris’s apparent desire for help, stating, “I have no doubt you genuinely want some assistance, but in the circumstances the court must impose an immediate custodial sentence.” He further explained that the severity of the offending, coupled with Harris’s prior criminal record, left no room for alternative sentencing options.
“The reason for that is the level of offending and degree of culpability is such that I cannot responsibly or properly take another course,” the judge declared. He underscored the importance of sending a clear message to the community and offenders alike that such criminal behavior, especially involving minors, will result in imprisonment. The court’s decision reflects the gravity with which the justice system treats crimes of this nature, particularly when committed by individuals with previous convictions for similar offenses.