PAMELA COOMBES OF HARTCLIFFE BANNED AFTER HORRIFIC CAT HOARDING IN BRISTOL
| Red Rose Database
Hartcliffe Animal Abuser
In August 2018, authorities responded to a distress call from neighbors living near 114 Gatcombe Road in Bristol, specifically in the Hartcliffe area, which led to a police raid on the residence of Pamela Coombes. The neighbors had contacted the RSPCA after repeatedly being denied entry by Coombes herself, raising concerns about the welfare of the numerous cats she was caring for.
Upon gaining access to her home, police officers and RSPCA inspectors encountered a scene described as profoundly unhygienic and unsuitable for the large number of animals confined within. The conditions were so deplorable that immediate action was taken to remove the cats from the premises. Many of these animals exhibited clear signs of suffering, including discharge from their eyes and noses, poor body condition, and sneezing fits. Veterinary assessments confirmed that a significant number of the cats were afflicted with cat flu, dental diseases, and flea infestations, highlighting the severity of neglect.
The RSPCA spokesperson emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, “Cats were immediately removed from the premises because of the conditions they were being kept, with some found to have discharge from their eyes and nose, some in poor body condition, and several sneezing. Vet assessments revealed many were suffering from cat flu, dental disease, and flea infestations.” She further described the environment as grossly unhygienic and unsuitable for the animals, noting the lack of adequate provisions for the number of cats kept in such a confined space.
During the court proceedings, District Judge Anthony Callaway acknowledged that there was no evidence to suggest that Coombes had acted with deliberate cruelty. Instead, he explained that her actions appeared to stem from a desire to help a large number of animals, which inadvertently led to neglect. The judge remarked, “Her actions were borne out of a desire to help too many animals to the extent that the care of others may be jeopardized by further additions and cruelty, not inflicted deliberately, but on the contrary, cruelty borne of kindness.”
Following her trial, Pamela Coombes was found guilty of five separate offences related to animal welfare. She received a two-year conditional discharge, meaning she would not serve time in prison but was subject to certain conditions. Additionally, she was banned from keeping cats for a period of three years, a restriction that expired in November 2022. All of the cats seized from her residence were handed over to the care of the RSPCA, ensuring they received proper treatment and rehabilitation.
This case highlights the dangers of hoarding and the importance of animal welfare enforcement in Bristol and beyond, serving as a stark reminder of the consequences of neglecting the needs of vulnerable animals.
Upon gaining access to her home, police officers and RSPCA inspectors encountered a scene described as profoundly unhygienic and unsuitable for the large number of animals confined within. The conditions were so deplorable that immediate action was taken to remove the cats from the premises. Many of these animals exhibited clear signs of suffering, including discharge from their eyes and noses, poor body condition, and sneezing fits. Veterinary assessments confirmed that a significant number of the cats were afflicted with cat flu, dental diseases, and flea infestations, highlighting the severity of neglect.
The RSPCA spokesperson emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, “Cats were immediately removed from the premises because of the conditions they were being kept, with some found to have discharge from their eyes and nose, some in poor body condition, and several sneezing. Vet assessments revealed many were suffering from cat flu, dental disease, and flea infestations.” She further described the environment as grossly unhygienic and unsuitable for the animals, noting the lack of adequate provisions for the number of cats kept in such a confined space.
During the court proceedings, District Judge Anthony Callaway acknowledged that there was no evidence to suggest that Coombes had acted with deliberate cruelty. Instead, he explained that her actions appeared to stem from a desire to help a large number of animals, which inadvertently led to neglect. The judge remarked, “Her actions were borne out of a desire to help too many animals to the extent that the care of others may be jeopardized by further additions and cruelty, not inflicted deliberately, but on the contrary, cruelty borne of kindness.”
Following her trial, Pamela Coombes was found guilty of five separate offences related to animal welfare. She received a two-year conditional discharge, meaning she would not serve time in prison but was subject to certain conditions. Additionally, she was banned from keeping cats for a period of three years, a restriction that expired in November 2022. All of the cats seized from her residence were handed over to the care of the RSPCA, ensuring they received proper treatment and rehabilitation.
This case highlights the dangers of hoarding and the importance of animal welfare enforcement in Bristol and beyond, serving as a stark reminder of the consequences of neglecting the needs of vulnerable animals.