NEAL JONES FROM CHESTER AND MENAI BRIDGE JAILED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES
| Red Rose Database
Chester Menai Bridge Child Sexual Abuser
In a serious case of child exploitation and possession of indecent images, Neal Jones, aged 57, formerly of Menai Bridge and currently residing in Chester, has been sentenced to 16 months in prison at Caernarfon Crown Court. The court proceedings revealed the disturbing extent of his offenses, which involved the download and possession of a significant number of indecent photographs and videos depicting children and extreme pornography involving animals.
Authorities acted on intelligence in May of the previous year, executing a search warrant at Jones's residence in Chester. During the raid, police seized various computer devices, which were later subjected to detailed forensic analysis by experts. The examination uncovered nearly 1,700 still images of children engaged in sexual acts, along with approximately 1,200 video files. The content was classified at various levels of severity, with some videos falling into the most serious category.
Prosecutor Jayne La Grua provided further details, stating that among the seized material, there were around 200 still images and 220 videos involving sexual activities with animals. Alarmingly, some of these images also depicted children, highlighting the disturbing nature of the material Jones had stored. The images predominantly involved male and female children aged between two and 13 years old. Jones admitted to officers that he had downloaded these files from file-sharing networks and that he had been engaged in this activity for a period of two to three years.
Jones claimed that he did not distribute the images and insisted that they were for his personal use only. However, the court was told there was no evidence to suggest any distribution of the material. His defense lawyer, John Philpotts, emphasized Jones's previously good character and noted that he had shown genuine remorse for his actions. The lawyer also highlighted that Jones had voluntarily undertaken and paid for a course of treatment aimed at preventing future access to such material.
Despite these mitigating factors, Judge John Rogers QC emphasized the severity of the case. He pointed out that the large volume of images, which ranged from the lowest to the most serious levels of classification, along with the presence of extreme pornography, warranted a custodial sentence. The judge ordered Jones to be placed on the sex offenders register for ten years and imposed a Sexual Offences Prevention Order, the details of which were not disclosed. Jones showed no visible emotion as he was led away from the courtroom, reflecting the gravity of his conviction and sentence.
Authorities acted on intelligence in May of the previous year, executing a search warrant at Jones's residence in Chester. During the raid, police seized various computer devices, which were later subjected to detailed forensic analysis by experts. The examination uncovered nearly 1,700 still images of children engaged in sexual acts, along with approximately 1,200 video files. The content was classified at various levels of severity, with some videos falling into the most serious category.
Prosecutor Jayne La Grua provided further details, stating that among the seized material, there were around 200 still images and 220 videos involving sexual activities with animals. Alarmingly, some of these images also depicted children, highlighting the disturbing nature of the material Jones had stored. The images predominantly involved male and female children aged between two and 13 years old. Jones admitted to officers that he had downloaded these files from file-sharing networks and that he had been engaged in this activity for a period of two to three years.
Jones claimed that he did not distribute the images and insisted that they were for his personal use only. However, the court was told there was no evidence to suggest any distribution of the material. His defense lawyer, John Philpotts, emphasized Jones's previously good character and noted that he had shown genuine remorse for his actions. The lawyer also highlighted that Jones had voluntarily undertaken and paid for a course of treatment aimed at preventing future access to such material.
Despite these mitigating factors, Judge John Rogers QC emphasized the severity of the case. He pointed out that the large volume of images, which ranged from the lowest to the most serious levels of classification, along with the presence of extreme pornography, warranted a custodial sentence. The judge ordered Jones to be placed on the sex offenders register for ten years and imposed a Sexual Offences Prevention Order, the details of which were not disclosed. Jones showed no visible emotion as he was led away from the courtroom, reflecting the gravity of his conviction and sentence.