MICHAEL PAGE FROM SOUTHAMPTON ESCAPES JAIL AFTER SEX OFFENSES INVOLVING TEENAGE GIRL
| Red Rose Database
Southampton Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the community of Southampton, Michael Page, a 41-year-old religious studies teacher residing on Avon Road in the Bitterne Park area, was found guilty of serious misconduct involving a minor. The incident involved the sexual touching of a 16-year-old girl and the possession and creation of indecent images of children, which he had downloaded.
Despite the gravity of his actions, Judge Derwin Hope at Southampton Crown Court decided not to impose a prison sentence of immediate custody. Instead, Page received a three-month prison term, which was suspended for 18 months, meaning he would not serve time unless he committed another offense within that period. Additionally, he was placed under an 18-month supervision order, requiring him to adhere to certain conditions and be monitored by authorities.
Furthermore, Page was explicitly banned from working with children and was prohibited from having any unsupervised contact with girls under the age of 16, except for his own daughters. His name was also entered onto the sex offenders’ register for a period of seven years, a measure intended to monitor and restrict his activities to protect the community.
During the sentencing, Judge Hope emphasized that Page had abused a position of trust as an educator. He remarked, “The incident involving the girl was not the most serious of offences, but she was a particularly vulnerable individual and the impact on her life has been particularly severe as a result. She was 16 and you were 40, which further aggravated the situation.”
Prosecutor James Newton-Price detailed the detrimental effects the incident had on the victim, stating that she had become afraid to leave her house, had lost contact with her friends, and was suffering from depression. These emotional and social consequences highlighted the serious nature of the case.
In his defense, solicitor Simon Gruchy explained that Page had suffered significant personal and financial hardship since the incident. He revealed that Page had lost his job and was now in debt amounting to approximately £30,000. “Financially, things have, not surprisingly, taken a turn for the worse as a result of all this,” Mr. Gruchy said.
As part of the court’s order, Page was required to pay costs amounting to £1,000. Additionally, the court ordered the confiscation of his computer, which was used in the commission of the offenses. Notably, Page had no previous criminal record prior to this case, which may have influenced the court’s decision to avoid immediate imprisonment.
Despite the gravity of his actions, Judge Derwin Hope at Southampton Crown Court decided not to impose a prison sentence of immediate custody. Instead, Page received a three-month prison term, which was suspended for 18 months, meaning he would not serve time unless he committed another offense within that period. Additionally, he was placed under an 18-month supervision order, requiring him to adhere to certain conditions and be monitored by authorities.
Furthermore, Page was explicitly banned from working with children and was prohibited from having any unsupervised contact with girls under the age of 16, except for his own daughters. His name was also entered onto the sex offenders’ register for a period of seven years, a measure intended to monitor and restrict his activities to protect the community.
During the sentencing, Judge Hope emphasized that Page had abused a position of trust as an educator. He remarked, “The incident involving the girl was not the most serious of offences, but she was a particularly vulnerable individual and the impact on her life has been particularly severe as a result. She was 16 and you were 40, which further aggravated the situation.”
Prosecutor James Newton-Price detailed the detrimental effects the incident had on the victim, stating that she had become afraid to leave her house, had lost contact with her friends, and was suffering from depression. These emotional and social consequences highlighted the serious nature of the case.
In his defense, solicitor Simon Gruchy explained that Page had suffered significant personal and financial hardship since the incident. He revealed that Page had lost his job and was now in debt amounting to approximately £30,000. “Financially, things have, not surprisingly, taken a turn for the worse as a result of all this,” Mr. Gruchy said.
As part of the court’s order, Page was required to pay costs amounting to £1,000. Additionally, the court ordered the confiscation of his computer, which was used in the commission of the offenses. Notably, Page had no previous criminal record prior to this case, which may have influenced the court’s decision to avoid immediate imprisonment.