MICHAEL CALLAGHAN FROM NEW BRIGHTON JAILED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IN MERSEY
| Red Rose Database
New Brighton Child Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the local community of New Brighton and the wider Merseyside area, Michael Callaghan, a 73-year-old resident of Wellington Road in New Brighton, has been sentenced to prison for possessing and downloading a vast collection of child pornography. The court heard that Callaghan had amassed an alarming total of 45,000 indecent images and videos depicting children, a revelation that has sparked outrage and concern among residents and authorities alike.
Callaghan’s actions came to light after an investigation initiated by American authorities, who alerted Merseyside Police about the trading of such illicit material through a website. The police acted swiftly, leading to Callaghan’s arrest following a tip-off. During the investigation, Callaghan cooperated with detectives, providing passwords, admitting to the downloads, and even making disturbing comparisons between images of naked boys and adult female pin-ups. Despite his cooperation, the severity of his actions was undeniable.
At Liverpool Crown Court, the prosecution outlined that the images were downloaded between November 2010 and February 2011. Out of all the images found on his hard drive, only 143 were in black and white, indicating the extensive nature of his collection. Callaghan, who was employed by Tesco until his retirement last year, faced multiple charges, including 15 counts of making indecent images, one count of distributing such images, and two counts of possession.
During the trial, Callaghan offered a controversial explanation, claiming that his obsession with these images stemmed from childhood abuse he suffered in the 1950s. He stated that a remark from an elderly relative about his mother’s lodger, a now-deceased bank clerk, triggered his repressed memories. Callaghan alleged that this lodger, along with other men, had abused him and taken photographs of him. He described the memories as a secret he had kept for over sixty years, which suddenly resurfaced, causing him great distress.
He explained to the court, “It was as if a secret I had kept to myself for sixty years had suddenly been loosened. I was beset by fears — images of this man and the way he had treated me. The one thing that came through it was the words of one of them that he was going to publish them and send a copy to my mother. It was devouring me. It gave me no peace. I had to find out if this was the truth.”
Prosecutor Derek Jones highlighted that Callaghan admitted to 15 counts of making indecent images, one of distributing them, and two of possessing such material. The defense, represented by Chris Williams, described Callaghan as “deeply regretful” and “grateful he had been caught,” suggesting some remorse for his actions.
However, Judge David Aubrey was unequivocal in his judgment. While acknowledging that Callaghan had been a victim of childhood abuse, the judge rejected his claims of not being sexually aroused by the images. In a serious tone, the judge stated, “This is a very troubling case. It is a very sad case. It is a very tragic case. There is no doubt you were abused as a child. But you were doing that which you were doing because you have an unhealthy interest in young children.”
He emphasized the gravity of the offenses, asserting that such material perpetuates the cycle of abuse and harms countless children worldwide. The judge sentenced Callaghan to 16 months in prison and imposed a ban on him working with children in the future, underscoring the seriousness of his crimes and the need for public protection.
Callaghan’s actions came to light after an investigation initiated by American authorities, who alerted Merseyside Police about the trading of such illicit material through a website. The police acted swiftly, leading to Callaghan’s arrest following a tip-off. During the investigation, Callaghan cooperated with detectives, providing passwords, admitting to the downloads, and even making disturbing comparisons between images of naked boys and adult female pin-ups. Despite his cooperation, the severity of his actions was undeniable.
At Liverpool Crown Court, the prosecution outlined that the images were downloaded between November 2010 and February 2011. Out of all the images found on his hard drive, only 143 were in black and white, indicating the extensive nature of his collection. Callaghan, who was employed by Tesco until his retirement last year, faced multiple charges, including 15 counts of making indecent images, one count of distributing such images, and two counts of possession.
During the trial, Callaghan offered a controversial explanation, claiming that his obsession with these images stemmed from childhood abuse he suffered in the 1950s. He stated that a remark from an elderly relative about his mother’s lodger, a now-deceased bank clerk, triggered his repressed memories. Callaghan alleged that this lodger, along with other men, had abused him and taken photographs of him. He described the memories as a secret he had kept for over sixty years, which suddenly resurfaced, causing him great distress.
He explained to the court, “It was as if a secret I had kept to myself for sixty years had suddenly been loosened. I was beset by fears — images of this man and the way he had treated me. The one thing that came through it was the words of one of them that he was going to publish them and send a copy to my mother. It was devouring me. It gave me no peace. I had to find out if this was the truth.”
Prosecutor Derek Jones highlighted that Callaghan admitted to 15 counts of making indecent images, one of distributing them, and two of possessing such material. The defense, represented by Chris Williams, described Callaghan as “deeply regretful” and “grateful he had been caught,” suggesting some remorse for his actions.
However, Judge David Aubrey was unequivocal in his judgment. While acknowledging that Callaghan had been a victim of childhood abuse, the judge rejected his claims of not being sexually aroused by the images. In a serious tone, the judge stated, “This is a very troubling case. It is a very sad case. It is a very tragic case. There is no doubt you were abused as a child. But you were doing that which you were doing because you have an unhealthy interest in young children.”
He emphasized the gravity of the offenses, asserting that such material perpetuates the cycle of abuse and harms countless children worldwide. The judge sentenced Callaghan to 16 months in prison and imposed a ban on him working with children in the future, underscoring the seriousness of his crimes and the need for public protection.