MAX WILKES FROM CHUDLEIGH INVOLVED IN CHILD ABUSE CASE AT EXETER CROWN COURT
| Red Rose Database
Chudleigh Child Sexual Abuser
In August 2022, a disturbing case unfolded at Exeter Crown Court involving Max Wilkes, a resident of Fore Street, Chudleigh. Wilkes, aged 30, was brought before the court amid serious allegations related to child exploitation and possession of indecent images. The proceedings revealed a complex and troubling history, including prior convictions and recent violations of court orders.
Wilkes, who has a history as a sex offender, made a shocking declaration during the hearing, stating that he 'self-identifies as a 12-year-old boy.' This claim was part of his attempt to explain his psychological state, which was further complicated by his recent inability to speak. For the past three months, Wilkes has been mute, and during the court session, he was required to communicate through written notes, which a support worker read aloud to the judge.
He pleaded guilty to two breaches of a sexual harm prevention order (SHPO) and to one count of making indecent images of children. The images, which had been downloaded onto his phone, were discovered during police examinations. The SHPO, originally imposed at Exeter Crown Court in December 2019, was designed to restrict Wilkes’s online activity and enable authorities to monitor his devices closely. Despite these restrictions, Wilkes admitted to violating the order in two significant ways: first, by possessing four devices capable of internet access, and second, by establishing an online account under a false name, thereby circumventing monitoring measures.
Judge Peter Johnson decided to adjourn the case until October, allowing law enforcement to conduct a more thorough investigation of Wilkes’s electronic devices. This delay aims to determine whether additional charges will be brought against him following a comprehensive review of the data stored on his devices.
During the hearing, Miss Rebecca Wood, representing Wilkes, explained that a recent psychological assessment had been conducted for social services. She described Wilkes’s case as complex, highlighting his self-identification as a 12-year-old boy named Oscar Green. This self-perception appears to be a significant aspect of his psychological profile and complicates his legal situation.
Prosecutor Mr. Nigel Wraith confirmed that authorities had found images on Wilkes’s phone during their examination. Additionally, a tablet device is still under review, and prosecutors are considering whether to pursue further charges related to alleged sexual communications with a minor. It is reported that Wilkes had contacted a young girl and sent her sexual messages, raising serious concerns about ongoing criminal behavior.
As the case continues to develop, the court remains vigilant about the potential for further charges and the implications of Wilkes’s psychological state and online activities. The proceedings underscore the ongoing challenges faced by law enforcement and social services in addressing complex cases involving online child exploitation and mental health issues.
Wilkes, who has a history as a sex offender, made a shocking declaration during the hearing, stating that he 'self-identifies as a 12-year-old boy.' This claim was part of his attempt to explain his psychological state, which was further complicated by his recent inability to speak. For the past three months, Wilkes has been mute, and during the court session, he was required to communicate through written notes, which a support worker read aloud to the judge.
He pleaded guilty to two breaches of a sexual harm prevention order (SHPO) and to one count of making indecent images of children. The images, which had been downloaded onto his phone, were discovered during police examinations. The SHPO, originally imposed at Exeter Crown Court in December 2019, was designed to restrict Wilkes’s online activity and enable authorities to monitor his devices closely. Despite these restrictions, Wilkes admitted to violating the order in two significant ways: first, by possessing four devices capable of internet access, and second, by establishing an online account under a false name, thereby circumventing monitoring measures.
Judge Peter Johnson decided to adjourn the case until October, allowing law enforcement to conduct a more thorough investigation of Wilkes’s electronic devices. This delay aims to determine whether additional charges will be brought against him following a comprehensive review of the data stored on his devices.
During the hearing, Miss Rebecca Wood, representing Wilkes, explained that a recent psychological assessment had been conducted for social services. She described Wilkes’s case as complex, highlighting his self-identification as a 12-year-old boy named Oscar Green. This self-perception appears to be a significant aspect of his psychological profile and complicates his legal situation.
Prosecutor Mr. Nigel Wraith confirmed that authorities had found images on Wilkes’s phone during their examination. Additionally, a tablet device is still under review, and prosecutors are considering whether to pursue further charges related to alleged sexual communications with a minor. It is reported that Wilkes had contacted a young girl and sent her sexual messages, raising serious concerns about ongoing criminal behavior.
As the case continues to develop, the court remains vigilant about the potential for further charges and the implications of Wilkes’s psychological state and online activities. The proceedings underscore the ongoing challenges faced by law enforcement and social services in addressing complex cases involving online child exploitation and mental health issues.