MATTHEW JOHNSON SENTENCED FOR CHILD ABUSE IN KIRBY STEPHEN AND WEST KIRBY
| Red Rose Database
West Kirby Kirby Stephen Sexual Abuser
In September 1998, a disturbing case of child abuse involving Matthew Johnson, a former house parent and Scout leader, came to light in the UK. Johnson, who had been entrusted with the care of vulnerable children at West Kirby Residential School and was actively involved with the 1st Great Meols Cub Scouts, was found guilty of multiple serious offences. His crimes spanned several years and locations, including Kirby Stephen and West Kirby, raising significant concerns about the abuse of authority and trust placed in him.
Johnson, aged 40 and residing at The Dock, The Old Court House, Kirby Stephen, Cumbria, was convicted of 13 counts of indecent assault and two counts of child abduction, involving nine young boys. The court proceedings revealed that Johnson had exploited his roles to commit these heinous acts. When sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court, he showed no visible emotion as Judge David Maddison handed down a sentence of four and a half years in prison. The judge also ordered Johnson to register as a sex offender for life, emphasizing the importance of public safety and the deterrence of similar conduct by others in positions of trust.
Judge Maddison underscored the gravity of Johnson’s breaches of trust, stating, “They looked to you for proper care and their parents looked to you for proper care. These were persistent offences and a gross breach of trust.” The court highlighted the disturbing trend of individuals abusing their authority over vulnerable children, and Johnson’s case was no exception.
The offences took place over several years, with Johnson initially denying two charges of indecently assaulting a boy at Balliol School in Sedburgh, where he began working in January 1985. He also denied six charges related to indecent assaults on a wheelchair-bound boy at his previous school. These denials were formally recorded and ordered to remain on file.
Prosecutor Timothy Holroyde detailed that Johnson’s employment as a house parent in West Kirby spanned from January 1980 to January 1985. During this period, he was responsible for caring for pupils with various difficulties and handicaps, as well as working with younger, more challenging boys. His role extended beyond the school premises, involving out-of-school care, camping trips in Wirral and the Lake District, and activities with Cub Scouts. The offences primarily involved boys aged between eight and eleven, with some incidents including spanking them on their bare bottoms and indecent touching.
Some of the abusive acts occurred at Johnson’s residence in Lake Place, Hoylake, while others took place at the school or during camping trips. The court also heard about a disturbing incident during the Christmas holidays in December 1984, when Johnson, along with another man, took a boy from the school to Cumbria without proper parental consent. During this trip, Johnson indecently assaulted one of the boys, and photographs—some posed—were taken of both children involved.
Johnson’s arrest in August 1996 marked the beginning of the legal proceedings. At that time, he admitted to occasionally smacking pupils who caused damage or posed a danger to themselves but denied any inappropriate conduct towards boys. By June of the following year, Johnson was working at a school in Holland, where he was re-arrested. He had no prior convictions before these offences came to light.
His defense lawyer, Anthony Gee QC, expressed remorse on Johnson’s behalf, stating that his client wished to apologize and regretted his actions. The lawyer noted that the offences occurred approximately 14 years prior and that Johnson had shown courage and honesty in admitting his past misconduct. Johnson had established a stable relationship with a woman in Holland, and they hoped to start a business together someday. Additionally, his father had passed away the previous year, and Johnson was caring for his widowed, wheelchair-bound mother at their shared home. The defense emphasized that Johnson’s mother would face significant difficulties without his support, which added a personal dimension to his circumstances.
In light of these factors, Judge Maddison indicated to the prison authorities that Johnson would benefit from specialized assistance available in certain correctional facilities. The court recognized that such support was in the best interest of both Johnson and the public, aiming to prevent future misconduct and aid in his rehabilitation.
Johnson, aged 40 and residing at The Dock, The Old Court House, Kirby Stephen, Cumbria, was convicted of 13 counts of indecent assault and two counts of child abduction, involving nine young boys. The court proceedings revealed that Johnson had exploited his roles to commit these heinous acts. When sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court, he showed no visible emotion as Judge David Maddison handed down a sentence of four and a half years in prison. The judge also ordered Johnson to register as a sex offender for life, emphasizing the importance of public safety and the deterrence of similar conduct by others in positions of trust.
Judge Maddison underscored the gravity of Johnson’s breaches of trust, stating, “They looked to you for proper care and their parents looked to you for proper care. These were persistent offences and a gross breach of trust.” The court highlighted the disturbing trend of individuals abusing their authority over vulnerable children, and Johnson’s case was no exception.
The offences took place over several years, with Johnson initially denying two charges of indecently assaulting a boy at Balliol School in Sedburgh, where he began working in January 1985. He also denied six charges related to indecent assaults on a wheelchair-bound boy at his previous school. These denials were formally recorded and ordered to remain on file.
Prosecutor Timothy Holroyde detailed that Johnson’s employment as a house parent in West Kirby spanned from January 1980 to January 1985. During this period, he was responsible for caring for pupils with various difficulties and handicaps, as well as working with younger, more challenging boys. His role extended beyond the school premises, involving out-of-school care, camping trips in Wirral and the Lake District, and activities with Cub Scouts. The offences primarily involved boys aged between eight and eleven, with some incidents including spanking them on their bare bottoms and indecent touching.
Some of the abusive acts occurred at Johnson’s residence in Lake Place, Hoylake, while others took place at the school or during camping trips. The court also heard about a disturbing incident during the Christmas holidays in December 1984, when Johnson, along with another man, took a boy from the school to Cumbria without proper parental consent. During this trip, Johnson indecently assaulted one of the boys, and photographs—some posed—were taken of both children involved.
Johnson’s arrest in August 1996 marked the beginning of the legal proceedings. At that time, he admitted to occasionally smacking pupils who caused damage or posed a danger to themselves but denied any inappropriate conduct towards boys. By June of the following year, Johnson was working at a school in Holland, where he was re-arrested. He had no prior convictions before these offences came to light.
His defense lawyer, Anthony Gee QC, expressed remorse on Johnson’s behalf, stating that his client wished to apologize and regretted his actions. The lawyer noted that the offences occurred approximately 14 years prior and that Johnson had shown courage and honesty in admitting his past misconduct. Johnson had established a stable relationship with a woman in Holland, and they hoped to start a business together someday. Additionally, his father had passed away the previous year, and Johnson was caring for his widowed, wheelchair-bound mother at their shared home. The defense emphasized that Johnson’s mother would face significant difficulties without his support, which added a personal dimension to his circumstances.
In light of these factors, Judge Maddison indicated to the prison authorities that Johnson would benefit from specialized assistance available in certain correctional facilities. The court recognized that such support was in the best interest of both Johnson and the public, aiming to prevent future misconduct and aid in his rehabilitation.