MARTIN SAMPSON FROM STROUD SENTENCED FOR SEXUAL OFFENCES INVOLVING 13-YEAR-OLD GIRL IN GLOUCESTERSHIRE
| Red Rose Database
Stroud Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the community of Stroud, Martin Sampson, aged 21, was sentenced to 22 months in prison after admitting to multiple serious sexual offences involving a 13-year-old girl. The incident took place in Gloucestershire, with the court proceedings held at Gloucester Crown Court, where the gravity of the offences was thoroughly examined.
Judge William Hart, presiding over the case, emphasized the severity of the crime, stating that any man engaging in sexual relations with a girl of such a young age must face imprisonment. The court heard that Sampson had confessed to five separate sex offences against the young girl, who was described by the judge as a vulnerable child.
Prosecutor Robert Davies provided detailed testimony about the case, revealing that the girl had visited Sampson’s flat in Stroud and disclosed her age to him. Despite this, Sampson claimed she appeared older and dismissed her age as irrelevant, asserting that he loved her. Over the course of a few weeks, their relationship escalated to sexual activity, with Sampson admitting to three instances of having sex with her.
The situation came to light after a relative of the girl grew suspicious, prompting police involvement. Initially, the girl denied any sexual contact, but police officers conducted a search of Sampson’s residence. During the search, they discovered a Christmas card from the girl and, upon examining his phone, found a graphic image of her performing a sexual act. These findings led to further interviews with both parties.
Tragically, the court was also informed that the girl became pregnant during this period but suffered a miscarriage a month later. Sampson had previously pleaded guilty to four counts of sexual activity with the girl between November 1, 2008, and January 23, 2009, as well as one count of taking an indecent photograph of her within the same timeframe. Although he had prior convictions for burglary, aggravated vehicle taking, and common assault, this was his first case involving sexual offences of this nature.
During the hearing, Sampson’s defense lawyer, Carole Knotts, argued that her client was a “very immature young man,” suggesting that his emotional development was akin to that of a late teenager. She contended that incarceration might not be the most appropriate response.
However, Judge Hart was unequivocal in his decision, emphasizing that the victim was a fully consenting party but was still only 13 years old—clearly a child, regardless of her own perceptions. The judge underscored the importance of protecting minors and maintaining strict legal standards in such cases.
In addition to the prison sentence, Sampson was disqualified from working with children and ordered to register as a sex offender for the next ten years, reflecting the serious nature of his crimes and the need for ongoing public safety measures.
Judge William Hart, presiding over the case, emphasized the severity of the crime, stating that any man engaging in sexual relations with a girl of such a young age must face imprisonment. The court heard that Sampson had confessed to five separate sex offences against the young girl, who was described by the judge as a vulnerable child.
Prosecutor Robert Davies provided detailed testimony about the case, revealing that the girl had visited Sampson’s flat in Stroud and disclosed her age to him. Despite this, Sampson claimed she appeared older and dismissed her age as irrelevant, asserting that he loved her. Over the course of a few weeks, their relationship escalated to sexual activity, with Sampson admitting to three instances of having sex with her.
The situation came to light after a relative of the girl grew suspicious, prompting police involvement. Initially, the girl denied any sexual contact, but police officers conducted a search of Sampson’s residence. During the search, they discovered a Christmas card from the girl and, upon examining his phone, found a graphic image of her performing a sexual act. These findings led to further interviews with both parties.
Tragically, the court was also informed that the girl became pregnant during this period but suffered a miscarriage a month later. Sampson had previously pleaded guilty to four counts of sexual activity with the girl between November 1, 2008, and January 23, 2009, as well as one count of taking an indecent photograph of her within the same timeframe. Although he had prior convictions for burglary, aggravated vehicle taking, and common assault, this was his first case involving sexual offences of this nature.
During the hearing, Sampson’s defense lawyer, Carole Knotts, argued that her client was a “very immature young man,” suggesting that his emotional development was akin to that of a late teenager. She contended that incarceration might not be the most appropriate response.
However, Judge Hart was unequivocal in his decision, emphasizing that the victim was a fully consenting party but was still only 13 years old—clearly a child, regardless of her own perceptions. The judge underscored the importance of protecting minors and maintaining strict legal standards in such cases.
In addition to the prison sentence, Sampson was disqualified from working with children and ordered to register as a sex offender for the next ten years, reflecting the serious nature of his crimes and the need for ongoing public safety measures.