MARTIN JOOS FROM TROWBRIDGE ESCAPES JAIL AFTER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGES IN SWINDON
| Red Rose Database
Trowbridge Child Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the local community of Trowbridge and the surrounding areas, Martin Joos, a 32-year-old resident of Ashton Street in Trowbridge, was recently brought before Swindon magistrates court on serious charges related to child pornography. Despite the gravity of the allegations, Joos was ultimately handed a relatively lenient sentence, walking free after being sentenced to a community rehabilitation order.
Joos had previously pleaded guilty to a total of 16 offences, which included 15 counts of downloading indecent images of children and one count of possession of a staggering 9,629 such images. The court was informed that the images involved were classified as level one and two, which are considered to be at the lower end of the severity scale in terms of child exploitation material. This classification played a role in the court’s decision to impose a community-based sentence rather than a custodial one.
The case against Joos was initiated following a police raid on Landslide Productions, an internet company based in Texas. During the investigation, authorities uncovered credit card records indicating that Joos had made six payments to this online child pornography ring between January and March of 1999. These financial transactions linked him directly to the illegal activity, prompting his arrest and subsequent court proceedings.
During police interviews, Joos initially denied any involvement with child pornography. However, he later admitted to viewing such material, claiming that he was unaware of its illegal status. Prosecutor Rosalind Cameron-Mowat outlined these details during the court hearing, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences despite the lower classification of the images involved.
Joos’s defense attorney, Tony Bignall, provided a different perspective, suggesting that his client’s actions were influenced by personal struggles. Bignall explained that Joos had been going through a difficult period in his life, which contributed to his behavior. He detailed that Joos’s sister had committed suicide, an event that devastated him profoundly. Additionally, Bignall mentioned that Joos had been in a relationship from 1993 to 1998, which had ended, further contributing to his emotional distress. The lawyer argued that these circumstances had led Joos to a breakdown, implying that his actions were not indicative of ongoing criminal intent.
As part of his sentence, Joos was ordered to attend a sex offenders’ rehabilitation program and to register with the police as a sex offender. He was also required to pay court costs amounting to £55. The court’s decision reflects a balance between acknowledging the seriousness of the offences and considering the mitigating personal circumstances presented during the trial, ultimately resulting in a community-based sentence rather than imprisonment.
Joos had previously pleaded guilty to a total of 16 offences, which included 15 counts of downloading indecent images of children and one count of possession of a staggering 9,629 such images. The court was informed that the images involved were classified as level one and two, which are considered to be at the lower end of the severity scale in terms of child exploitation material. This classification played a role in the court’s decision to impose a community-based sentence rather than a custodial one.
The case against Joos was initiated following a police raid on Landslide Productions, an internet company based in Texas. During the investigation, authorities uncovered credit card records indicating that Joos had made six payments to this online child pornography ring between January and March of 1999. These financial transactions linked him directly to the illegal activity, prompting his arrest and subsequent court proceedings.
During police interviews, Joos initially denied any involvement with child pornography. However, he later admitted to viewing such material, claiming that he was unaware of its illegal status. Prosecutor Rosalind Cameron-Mowat outlined these details during the court hearing, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences despite the lower classification of the images involved.
Joos’s defense attorney, Tony Bignall, provided a different perspective, suggesting that his client’s actions were influenced by personal struggles. Bignall explained that Joos had been going through a difficult period in his life, which contributed to his behavior. He detailed that Joos’s sister had committed suicide, an event that devastated him profoundly. Additionally, Bignall mentioned that Joos had been in a relationship from 1993 to 1998, which had ended, further contributing to his emotional distress. The lawyer argued that these circumstances had led Joos to a breakdown, implying that his actions were not indicative of ongoing criminal intent.
As part of his sentence, Joos was ordered to attend a sex offenders’ rehabilitation program and to register with the police as a sex offender. He was also required to pay court costs amounting to £55. The court’s decision reflects a balance between acknowledging the seriousness of the offences and considering the mitigating personal circumstances presented during the trial, ultimately resulting in a community-based sentence rather than imprisonment.