MARGARET AND PHILIP REDMAN HORRIFICALLY ABANDON ROCHESTER CAT WITH TUMOUR
| Red Rose Database
Rochester Animal Abuser
On Saturday, March 9, 2019, RSPCA officers conducted a welfare visit to a residence on Borstal Street in Rochester, where they uncovered a distressing case of animal neglect involving Margaret and Philip Redman. The officers found their pet cat, Misty, suffering from a severe and painful oral tumour. The growth had grown so extensively that teeth were embedded within it, causing significant discomfort and making it extremely difficult for the animal to eat or drink properly.
In addition to the tumour, Misty’s condition was further compounded by neglect. Her fur was heavily matted and caked with faeces, and there was noticeable discharge emanating from the tumour, indicating a lack of proper care and hygiene. The officers questioned the Redmans about the delay in seeking veterinary assistance, and Mrs Redman admitted that they had postponed taking Misty to a vet because she was afraid the cat would be euthanized. This delay had allowed the condition to worsen considerably, subjecting Misty to unnecessary suffering.
The Redmans, both of whom reside at the same address, faced charges for their failure to ensure the welfare of their animal and for causing unnecessary suffering. They pleaded guilty to two counts each of animal cruelty, specifically for neglecting Misty’s health and well-being. Their solicitor argued in court that imposing community sentences with the possibility of unpaid work would be inappropriate, though the court ultimately decided on a different course of action.
As part of their sentence, Margaret and Philip Redman received a community order that required them to attend a rehabilitation course. Additionally, they were ordered to pay costs amounting to £300. The case drew attention to the importance of responsible pet ownership and the consequences of neglecting animals in distress, especially in a community like Rochester where animal welfare is taken seriously.
In addition to the tumour, Misty’s condition was further compounded by neglect. Her fur was heavily matted and caked with faeces, and there was noticeable discharge emanating from the tumour, indicating a lack of proper care and hygiene. The officers questioned the Redmans about the delay in seeking veterinary assistance, and Mrs Redman admitted that they had postponed taking Misty to a vet because she was afraid the cat would be euthanized. This delay had allowed the condition to worsen considerably, subjecting Misty to unnecessary suffering.
The Redmans, both of whom reside at the same address, faced charges for their failure to ensure the welfare of their animal and for causing unnecessary suffering. They pleaded guilty to two counts each of animal cruelty, specifically for neglecting Misty’s health and well-being. Their solicitor argued in court that imposing community sentences with the possibility of unpaid work would be inappropriate, though the court ultimately decided on a different course of action.
As part of their sentence, Margaret and Philip Redman received a community order that required them to attend a rehabilitation course. Additionally, they were ordered to pay costs amounting to £300. The case drew attention to the importance of responsible pet ownership and the consequences of neglecting animals in distress, especially in a community like Rochester where animal welfare is taken seriously.