LIAM SHIELDS FROM CLINTONVILLE SENT BACK TO PRISON FOR CHILD SEX OFFENCES IN NORTHAMPTON
| Red Rose Database
Clintonville Child Sexual Abuser
In August 2020, Liam Shields, a man with a troubling history of child sexual offenses, was once again brought before Northampton Crown Court to face the consequences of his latest misconduct. Shields, aged 38 and residing in Clintonville, was convicted of serious child sex crimes and sentenced to an extended term of imprisonment. The court ordered that he serve 33 months behind bars before being eligible for parole, followed by an additional 17 months on license, reflecting the gravity of his repeated offenses.
Shields’s criminal record is extensive. He was originally sentenced to seven years in prison in 2012 after being found guilty of 42 counts related to child grooming. His previous crimes involved creating fake online profiles to lure young children, coercing them into exposing themselves via webcam, and possessing indecent images of minors. His actions caused significant psychological harm to his victims and demonstrated a disturbing pattern of predatory behavior.
The latest incident began with a tip-off from a concerned member of the public in May of this year. The witness reported observing Shields behaving suspiciously in a Northampton park, where he approached three children and engaged in inappropriate conduct. During this encounter, Shields pressured the children into removing their socks and shoes, an act that raised alarm among the witnesses and prompted police intervention.
Following the tip-off, law enforcement launched a thorough investigation. Police officers discovered that Shields had numerous photographs of children’s feet stored on his mobile phone, which further implicated him in inappropriate activities. The evidence collected led to his arrest and subsequent court proceedings. During the sentencing hearing, His Honour Judge Rupert Mayo did not mince words about Shields’s dangerous behavior. He described Shields’s alleged foot fetish as “an unattractive and dangerous addiction to sexual flirting with underage children,” emphasizing the serious risk he posed to the community.
Judge Mayo highlighted the findings of Shields’s pre-sentence report, which assessed his risk to children as “high” in terms of psychological and emotional harm. The judge expressed concern that Shields’s continued offending could cause further harm to children and the public, underscoring the need for a lengthy custodial sentence to protect society.
Shields’s criminal history also includes a 2015 incident where he was recalled to prison after breaching a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO). He had been released in April of that year after serving less than half of his original sentence. The court revealed that Shields had created online profiles on Facebook and MSN, pretending to be an 11 to 13-year-old girl and her older brother. He then persuaded children as young as nine to expose themselves via webcam, using emotional blackmail and threats of self-harm or distribution of explicit images to coerce compliance.
During the investigation, authorities found that Shields had refused to surrender his mobile phone, which was equipped with internet access, and was found to possess a USB stick. Further analysis revealed that he had set up accounts on adult dating websites and social media platforms, including Instagram, where he searched for images of children’s feet. Although there was no evidence of direct contact, these searches indicated ongoing inappropriate interests.
Despite completing a sexual offenders treatment program while incarcerated, Shields’s response was deemed inadequate by the court. Judge Timothy Smith sentenced him to an additional six months in prison for breaching the terms of his SOPO, reflecting the court’s concern over his continued predatory tendencies.
Shields’s criminal activities date back to March 2012, when he was initially jailed for seven years after creating fake profiles to target children online. His methods involved persuading young victims to expose themselves and then using emotional blackmail to maintain control. Prosecutors described him as a feared predator who may have targeted up to 200 children, both boys and girls, under the guise of a peer of similar age.
His offenses included making, possessing, and distributing indecent images of children, as well as engaging in sexual activities in the presence of minors. The court heard harrowing accounts from victims’ families, including a mother who described Shields’s vile language directed at her 10-year-old daughter. The judge condemned Shields’s actions as “sinister” and emphasized the emotional trauma inflicted upon his victims.
As Shields was led away to begin his latest sentence, members of the public and victims’ families expressed relief and hope that he would be kept away from children for a long time. Law enforcement officials, including Detective Constable Katy Tyrrell, warned that there are likely many more individuals like Shields operating online, targeting vulnerable children for sexual exploitation. Authorities urged parents to remain vigilant and to report any suspicious activity to help prevent further abuse and protect innocent children from predators like Liam Shields.
Shields’s criminal record is extensive. He was originally sentenced to seven years in prison in 2012 after being found guilty of 42 counts related to child grooming. His previous crimes involved creating fake online profiles to lure young children, coercing them into exposing themselves via webcam, and possessing indecent images of minors. His actions caused significant psychological harm to his victims and demonstrated a disturbing pattern of predatory behavior.
The latest incident began with a tip-off from a concerned member of the public in May of this year. The witness reported observing Shields behaving suspiciously in a Northampton park, where he approached three children and engaged in inappropriate conduct. During this encounter, Shields pressured the children into removing their socks and shoes, an act that raised alarm among the witnesses and prompted police intervention.
Following the tip-off, law enforcement launched a thorough investigation. Police officers discovered that Shields had numerous photographs of children’s feet stored on his mobile phone, which further implicated him in inappropriate activities. The evidence collected led to his arrest and subsequent court proceedings. During the sentencing hearing, His Honour Judge Rupert Mayo did not mince words about Shields’s dangerous behavior. He described Shields’s alleged foot fetish as “an unattractive and dangerous addiction to sexual flirting with underage children,” emphasizing the serious risk he posed to the community.
Judge Mayo highlighted the findings of Shields’s pre-sentence report, which assessed his risk to children as “high” in terms of psychological and emotional harm. The judge expressed concern that Shields’s continued offending could cause further harm to children and the public, underscoring the need for a lengthy custodial sentence to protect society.
Shields’s criminal history also includes a 2015 incident where he was recalled to prison after breaching a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO). He had been released in April of that year after serving less than half of his original sentence. The court revealed that Shields had created online profiles on Facebook and MSN, pretending to be an 11 to 13-year-old girl and her older brother. He then persuaded children as young as nine to expose themselves via webcam, using emotional blackmail and threats of self-harm or distribution of explicit images to coerce compliance.
During the investigation, authorities found that Shields had refused to surrender his mobile phone, which was equipped with internet access, and was found to possess a USB stick. Further analysis revealed that he had set up accounts on adult dating websites and social media platforms, including Instagram, where he searched for images of children’s feet. Although there was no evidence of direct contact, these searches indicated ongoing inappropriate interests.
Despite completing a sexual offenders treatment program while incarcerated, Shields’s response was deemed inadequate by the court. Judge Timothy Smith sentenced him to an additional six months in prison for breaching the terms of his SOPO, reflecting the court’s concern over his continued predatory tendencies.
Shields’s criminal activities date back to March 2012, when he was initially jailed for seven years after creating fake profiles to target children online. His methods involved persuading young victims to expose themselves and then using emotional blackmail to maintain control. Prosecutors described him as a feared predator who may have targeted up to 200 children, both boys and girls, under the guise of a peer of similar age.
His offenses included making, possessing, and distributing indecent images of children, as well as engaging in sexual activities in the presence of minors. The court heard harrowing accounts from victims’ families, including a mother who described Shields’s vile language directed at her 10-year-old daughter. The judge condemned Shields’s actions as “sinister” and emphasized the emotional trauma inflicted upon his victims.
As Shields was led away to begin his latest sentence, members of the public and victims’ families expressed relief and hope that he would be kept away from children for a long time. Law enforcement officials, including Detective Constable Katy Tyrrell, warned that there are likely many more individuals like Shields operating online, targeting vulnerable children for sexual exploitation. Authorities urged parents to remain vigilant and to report any suspicious activity to help prevent further abuse and protect innocent children from predators like Liam Shields.