LAURENCE MANSON FROM SHETLAND SENTENCED FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AT SKELD
| Red Rose Database
Shetland Sexual Abuser
In a recent case heard at Lerwick Sheriff Court, Laurence Manson, a resident of Norbister in Shetland, was sentenced for a serious sexual assault that occurred over nine years ago. The incident involved a 14-year-old girl and took place at the end of a social gathering in the village of Skeld on 13 May 2013.
During the court proceedings, it was revealed that Manson, then aged 25, had engaged in inappropriate and unlawful conduct towards the young girl. He admitted to intentionally or recklessly touching her thighs and rubbing her inner thigh after his request for a kiss was refused. The court heard that Manson repeatedly placed his hands on her legs and made physical advances despite her clear refusal, which constituted a sexual assault under the law.
The case only came to light eight years later when the girl, now an adult, confided in a counsellor about the incident. Following this disclosure, she formally reported the matter to the police, leading to Manson’s arrest and subsequent court proceedings. The court was informed that the girl managed to escape the situation by hiding outside the house, which prevented further harm.
During the hearing, Manson’s legal representative, solicitor Martin Morrow, emphasized that the incident occurred nearly a decade ago and highlighted that his client had otherwise maintained a “blameless life.” Morrow pointed out that Manson had shown genuine remorse for his actions and had been actively seeking professional help to address his behaviour. He also noted that Manson is a father and the primary breadwinner for his family, urging the court to consider these factors in sentencing.
In mitigation, Morrow requested that the court avoid imposing a custodial sentence, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence but also the low risk of re-offending given Manson’s remorse and efforts to rehabilitate.
Sheriff Ian Cruickshank acknowledged that Manson, now 35, had demonstrated insight into the gravity of his actions. The sheriff expressed confidence that Manson posed a low risk of re-offending and took into account that this was his first offence. As a result, the court decided to impose a community payback order instead of jail time.
Manson was ordered to complete 225 hours of unpaid work within 12 months. A review of his progress will be conducted in three months to assess compliance and rehabilitation efforts. The court’s decision reflects a balance between accountability and the potential for reform, considering the circumstances of the case and Manson’s remorseful attitude.
During the court proceedings, it was revealed that Manson, then aged 25, had engaged in inappropriate and unlawful conduct towards the young girl. He admitted to intentionally or recklessly touching her thighs and rubbing her inner thigh after his request for a kiss was refused. The court heard that Manson repeatedly placed his hands on her legs and made physical advances despite her clear refusal, which constituted a sexual assault under the law.
The case only came to light eight years later when the girl, now an adult, confided in a counsellor about the incident. Following this disclosure, she formally reported the matter to the police, leading to Manson’s arrest and subsequent court proceedings. The court was informed that the girl managed to escape the situation by hiding outside the house, which prevented further harm.
During the hearing, Manson’s legal representative, solicitor Martin Morrow, emphasized that the incident occurred nearly a decade ago and highlighted that his client had otherwise maintained a “blameless life.” Morrow pointed out that Manson had shown genuine remorse for his actions and had been actively seeking professional help to address his behaviour. He also noted that Manson is a father and the primary breadwinner for his family, urging the court to consider these factors in sentencing.
In mitigation, Morrow requested that the court avoid imposing a custodial sentence, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence but also the low risk of re-offending given Manson’s remorse and efforts to rehabilitate.
Sheriff Ian Cruickshank acknowledged that Manson, now 35, had demonstrated insight into the gravity of his actions. The sheriff expressed confidence that Manson posed a low risk of re-offending and took into account that this was his first offence. As a result, the court decided to impose a community payback order instead of jail time.
Manson was ordered to complete 225 hours of unpaid work within 12 months. A review of his progress will be conducted in three months to assess compliance and rehabilitation efforts. The court’s decision reflects a balance between accountability and the potential for reform, considering the circumstances of the case and Manson’s remorseful attitude.