KENNETH DOVE FROM BISHOP MIDDLEHAM JAILED FOR CHILD ABUSE IN COUNTY DURHAM
| Red Rose Database
Bishop Middleham Sexual Abuser
In a case that has shocked the local community of Bishop Middleham near Sedgefield in County Durham, a 66-year-old man named Kenneth Dove was sentenced to a 20-year prison term following his conviction for child abuse that occurred over two decades ago.
Despite the lengthy period since the alleged offences and the fact that Dove maintains his innocence, the court found it necessary to impose a significant custodial sentence. The proceedings took place at Teesside Crown Court, where Judge Peter Bowers delivered the verdict after a trial held in August, during which Dove was convicted of one count of indecent assault. The jury, however, was unable to reach a unanimous decision on five additional charges related to similar allegations.
During the sentencing hearing, Dove’s legal representative, Scott Smith, argued that the defendant’s numerous health issues should be taken into account when considering the appropriate punishment. Smith suggested that incarcerating Dove would impose an undue burden on prison resources, given his medical conditions. He emphasized that Dove, who arrived at court on crutches and was visibly balding, was no longer considered a threat to children, citing the long passage of time since the offences and the absence of new complaints.
Smith proposed that instead of immediate imprisonment, a community order with extensive supervision and a night-time curfew might serve as a more suitable alternative. He stated, “There is a long list of medical problems the defendant suffers from. They will place a heavy burden on the prison authorities should an immediate sentence be passed.” He further added, “Albeit, the defendant still continues to deny the offence, it is still disturbing there is no alternative disposal set out in the recommendation of the [probation] report, save custody.”
He urged the court to consider the potential for a less restrictive sentence, arguing that Dove does not pose an ongoing threat to children and questioning the report’s conclusion that there is a “high risk of sexual harm.” Smith pointed out that no other complainants have come forward in the years since the alleged offences, which took place over 20 years ago, and called for a more compassionate approach.
However, Judge Bowers was firm in his decision, stating, “Even taking into account your health, an immediate sentence is necessary.” The court’s ruling reflects the seriousness with which the judicial system treats offences of this nature, regardless of the passage of time or the defendant’s health status.
Despite the lengthy period since the alleged offences and the fact that Dove maintains his innocence, the court found it necessary to impose a significant custodial sentence. The proceedings took place at Teesside Crown Court, where Judge Peter Bowers delivered the verdict after a trial held in August, during which Dove was convicted of one count of indecent assault. The jury, however, was unable to reach a unanimous decision on five additional charges related to similar allegations.
During the sentencing hearing, Dove’s legal representative, Scott Smith, argued that the defendant’s numerous health issues should be taken into account when considering the appropriate punishment. Smith suggested that incarcerating Dove would impose an undue burden on prison resources, given his medical conditions. He emphasized that Dove, who arrived at court on crutches and was visibly balding, was no longer considered a threat to children, citing the long passage of time since the offences and the absence of new complaints.
Smith proposed that instead of immediate imprisonment, a community order with extensive supervision and a night-time curfew might serve as a more suitable alternative. He stated, “There is a long list of medical problems the defendant suffers from. They will place a heavy burden on the prison authorities should an immediate sentence be passed.” He further added, “Albeit, the defendant still continues to deny the offence, it is still disturbing there is no alternative disposal set out in the recommendation of the [probation] report, save custody.”
He urged the court to consider the potential for a less restrictive sentence, arguing that Dove does not pose an ongoing threat to children and questioning the report’s conclusion that there is a “high risk of sexual harm.” Smith pointed out that no other complainants have come forward in the years since the alleged offences, which took place over 20 years ago, and called for a more compassionate approach.
However, Judge Bowers was firm in his decision, stating, “Even taking into account your health, an immediate sentence is necessary.” The court’s ruling reflects the seriousness with which the judicial system treats offences of this nature, regardless of the passage of time or the defendant’s health status.