JOHN STANNARD CAUGHT IN AYLSHAM SCANDAL AT NORWICH TRAIN STATION
| Red Rose Database
Aylsham Child Sexual Abuser
In October 2017, a serious incident unfolded involving John Stannard, a 52-year-old man from Aylsham, who found himself at the center of a high-profile case at Norwich Railway Station. The incident was a stark reminder of the dangers posed by online predators and the vigilant efforts of community members to combat such threats.
According to court records, Stannard had arranged to meet what he believed was a 15-year-old girl named Maria, whom he had contacted through a dating website. Despite being explicitly told her age, Stannard dismissed the warning, claiming that "age was just a number," and engaged in inappropriate and sexual conversations with her. The exchanges included requests for explicit photographs, with Stannard asking the girl to send a picture of her breasts and himself sending an indecent photo in return.
On the day of the planned meeting, Stannard booked a hotel room in Norwich and traveled to the station, expecting to meet the girl. However, instead of the young girl, he was confronted by vigilante paedophile hunters who had been monitoring his online activity. These community members had set a trap, capturing footage of Stannard's arrival and his intentions. The vigilantes detained him until police arrived to arrest him. The footage of the confrontation was subsequently uploaded to YouTube, where it gained widespread attention.
During the court proceedings, Stannard admitted to attempting to meet a female under the age of 16 with the intent of sexual grooming. The court heard that he had been actively seeking to engage in sexual activity with a minor, which led to his conviction. Judge Maureen Bacon sentenced him to 18 months in prison, suspended for two years. Additionally, Stannard was ordered to complete 200 hours of unpaid community work and was placed on the sex offender register for a period of ten years. He was also required to pay £1200 towards prosecution costs.
Judge Bacon emphasized that Stannard's actions were entirely his own responsibility, stating, "You thought you were meeting a 15-year-old girl, but instead, you were confronted by vigilant community members. You have no one to blame but yourself for your downfall." The case served as a sobering reminder of the dangers of online predatory behavior and the importance of community vigilance in protecting vulnerable individuals.
According to court records, Stannard had arranged to meet what he believed was a 15-year-old girl named Maria, whom he had contacted through a dating website. Despite being explicitly told her age, Stannard dismissed the warning, claiming that "age was just a number," and engaged in inappropriate and sexual conversations with her. The exchanges included requests for explicit photographs, with Stannard asking the girl to send a picture of her breasts and himself sending an indecent photo in return.
On the day of the planned meeting, Stannard booked a hotel room in Norwich and traveled to the station, expecting to meet the girl. However, instead of the young girl, he was confronted by vigilante paedophile hunters who had been monitoring his online activity. These community members had set a trap, capturing footage of Stannard's arrival and his intentions. The vigilantes detained him until police arrived to arrest him. The footage of the confrontation was subsequently uploaded to YouTube, where it gained widespread attention.
During the court proceedings, Stannard admitted to attempting to meet a female under the age of 16 with the intent of sexual grooming. The court heard that he had been actively seeking to engage in sexual activity with a minor, which led to his conviction. Judge Maureen Bacon sentenced him to 18 months in prison, suspended for two years. Additionally, Stannard was ordered to complete 200 hours of unpaid community work and was placed on the sex offender register for a period of ten years. He was also required to pay £1200 towards prosecution costs.
Judge Bacon emphasized that Stannard's actions were entirely his own responsibility, stating, "You thought you were meeting a 15-year-old girl, but instead, you were confronted by vigilant community members. You have no one to blame but yourself for your downfall." The case served as a sobering reminder of the dangers of online predatory behavior and the importance of community vigilance in protecting vulnerable individuals.