JOHN HOBBS FROM BIRCHINGTON SENTENCED FOR CHILD PORNOGRAPHY OFFENSES IN KENT
| Red Rose Database
Birchington Child Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the local community of Birchington and the wider Kent area, John Hobbs, a 61-year-old resident of Quex View Road in Birchington, faced serious criminal charges related to the possession and distribution of indecent images of children. The case came to light after police investigations uncovered a significant collection of illicit material stored on Hobbs's electronic devices, which included a computer and a laptop.
According to court records, Hobbs had been involved in the downloading of child pornography over a period spanning from May 2004 to October 2008. When authorities executed a search warrant at his home in August 2008, they seized a Dell laptop, two memory sticks, and an A4 printout containing four indecent images. The investigation revealed that Hobbs had accumulated a total of 1,413 images classified at the lowest level of severity, along with 172 images at the second level, 218 at the third, 234 at the fourth, and 14 at the most serious level, indicating a disturbing escalation in the nature of the content.
Further complicating the case was the fact that Hobbs had recently donated a computer to a local scout group, which was also seized by authorities. This act raised concerns about the potential distribution or sharing of illicit material, although Hobbs claimed he was an 'arbitrary downloader' who was addicted to viewing such content. During police interviews, Hobbs admitted to downloading child pornography but insisted he was unaware of the extent of his collection. He stated that he believed the images he printed out were of adults over 18 and that he had not taken steps to prevent accidental downloads of child images. He also claimed that he thought the images had been deleted before he handed the computer over to the scout group.
Police traced Hobbs through a website he accessed, which led to his arrest. The investigation uncovered over 1,000 indecent images of children, which were found on both his computer and laptop. Hobbs's actions prompted a court appearance at Canterbury Crown Court, where he pleaded guilty to 20 charges of making or possessing indecent images of children.
In sentencing, the court imposed a 48-week prison term, suspended for two years, on the condition that Hobbs attend a sex offender treatment program and remain under supervision for the next two years. Additionally, he was placed under a five-year sex offences prevention order, restricting his activities and access to certain materials. His computer equipment was also confiscated and forfeited.
Prosecutor Edmund Fowler highlighted that Hobbs had no prior convictions, and his legal representative, Nicholas Jones, emphasized that there was no evidence of distribution or sharing of the images. Since his arrest, Hobbs had voluntarily sought help through the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, a child protection charity, and had been attending self-funded sessions with a psychiatrist. Jones argued that Hobbs was motivated to address his issues and expressed hope that he would not reappear in court. The court was informed that Hobbs was assessed as being at low risk of re-offending, and the case served as a stark reminder of the ongoing need for vigilance and intervention in such cases.
According to court records, Hobbs had been involved in the downloading of child pornography over a period spanning from May 2004 to October 2008. When authorities executed a search warrant at his home in August 2008, they seized a Dell laptop, two memory sticks, and an A4 printout containing four indecent images. The investigation revealed that Hobbs had accumulated a total of 1,413 images classified at the lowest level of severity, along with 172 images at the second level, 218 at the third, 234 at the fourth, and 14 at the most serious level, indicating a disturbing escalation in the nature of the content.
Further complicating the case was the fact that Hobbs had recently donated a computer to a local scout group, which was also seized by authorities. This act raised concerns about the potential distribution or sharing of illicit material, although Hobbs claimed he was an 'arbitrary downloader' who was addicted to viewing such content. During police interviews, Hobbs admitted to downloading child pornography but insisted he was unaware of the extent of his collection. He stated that he believed the images he printed out were of adults over 18 and that he had not taken steps to prevent accidental downloads of child images. He also claimed that he thought the images had been deleted before he handed the computer over to the scout group.
Police traced Hobbs through a website he accessed, which led to his arrest. The investigation uncovered over 1,000 indecent images of children, which were found on both his computer and laptop. Hobbs's actions prompted a court appearance at Canterbury Crown Court, where he pleaded guilty to 20 charges of making or possessing indecent images of children.
In sentencing, the court imposed a 48-week prison term, suspended for two years, on the condition that Hobbs attend a sex offender treatment program and remain under supervision for the next two years. Additionally, he was placed under a five-year sex offences prevention order, restricting his activities and access to certain materials. His computer equipment was also confiscated and forfeited.
Prosecutor Edmund Fowler highlighted that Hobbs had no prior convictions, and his legal representative, Nicholas Jones, emphasized that there was no evidence of distribution or sharing of the images. Since his arrest, Hobbs had voluntarily sought help through the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, a child protection charity, and had been attending self-funded sessions with a psychiatrist. Jones argued that Hobbs was motivated to address his issues and expressed hope that he would not reappear in court. The court was informed that Hobbs was assessed as being at low risk of re-offending, and the case served as a stark reminder of the ongoing need for vigilance and intervention in such cases.