JASON HAMON FROM JERSEY SENTENCED TO SEVEN YEARS FOR CHILD ABUSE IN JERSEY

 |  Red Rose Database

Jersey Child Sexual Abuser
In a recent and highly disturbing case, Jason Hamon, a man from Jersey, has been handed a seven-year prison sentence after being found guilty of multiple counts of child abuse. The court proceedings revealed that Hamon, aged 36 at the time of sentencing, had pleaded guilty to charges of gross indecency and repeated indecent assaults against a young girl.

The victim, who was between 11 and 13 years old during the period of abuse, endured a series of assaults over a span of 19 months. The court heard that Hamon had only recently been released from incarceration, having served part of an 18-month sentence for two previous offenses involving children. This prior history added a layer of concern regarding his potential risk to the community.

Details presented during the trial painted a disturbing picture of Hamon’s conduct. Crown Advocate Conrad Yates described how Hamon had repeatedly touched the girl and attempted to coerce her into performing sexual acts. The court was informed that Hamon had threatened the girl with physical violence, warning her that he would hit her if she disclosed the abuse to her mother. Furthermore, he had used threats of violence and offered her money in an attempt to silence her, emphasizing the severity of his manipulative tactics.

The court also heard that Hamon’s abuse took place in private settings, including the girl’s bed and bath, further highlighting the invasive and traumatic nature of his actions. The Crown Advocate emphasized the gravity of the offenses, which not only caused immediate harm but also had the potential for long-lasting psychological effects on the victim.

In delivering the sentence, Commissioner Francis Hamon OBE underscored the importance of the court’s role in condemning such acts. He stated that the judiciary has a duty to reflect society’s revulsion towards child abuse and to acknowledge the profound and enduring impact these crimes have on victims. The court’s decision aimed to serve as a clear message that such conduct is unacceptable and will be met with severe consequences.
← Back to search results