JAMIE RUSHTON FROM RICKMANSWORTH JAILED FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT IN SURREY HOTEL
| Red Rose Database
Rickmansworth Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the local community, Jamie Rushton, a 45-year-old married veterinarian from Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, was sentenced to 18 months in prison following his conviction for sexual assault. The incident took place at the Runnymede on Thames Hotel and Spa in Egham, Surrey, on the night of June 25, 2017, and has since garnered significant media attention due to the nature of the offense and the circumstances surrounding it.
According to court records, Rushton assaulted a woman who was staying at the hotel that night. The woman, who had consumed a large amount of alcohol, woke up in Rushton's hotel room with no memory of how she arrived there or what had transpired. The assault involved Rushton taking photographs of himself sexually touching her while she was unconscious in bed. The images included explicit photographs of her naked bottom and showed Rushton's hands moving towards her private parts. The victim described the incident as highly embarrassing and very uncomfortable, expressing her distress over the violation of her trust.
It was only two years later that Rushton's wife discovered images of the woman on his computer. Concerned, she reported her findings to the police, which initiated an investigation. The authorities eventually contacted the victim in 2021, and she confirmed that the images depicted her. However, she was unable to recall the specific details of the night Rushton assaulted her. During the investigation, law enforcement also uncovered additional disturbing material on Rushton's devices, including photographs taken upskirt of women using public transport, further highlighting a pattern of inappropriate behavior.
During the court proceedings, the victim testified about the emotional impact of the incident, emphasizing her feelings of embarrassment and discomfort. She stated that Rushton was an attractive man but made it clear that she was not attracted to him and would not have consented to any sexual activity. She firmly believed that she would not have allowed such an encounter to happen, given her own understanding of her boundaries and feelings.
Rushton, who has been practicing veterinary medicine since 2007 at the Village Vet practice in Hampstead, attempted to justify his actions by claiming that the woman had flirted with him earlier that evening. He described how she had draped herself across him while sitting on a chair, stroked his goatee and hair, and indicated she wanted to continue their interaction. Rushton claimed that they had gone into his room, where they lay on the bed fully clothed before kissing more intensely. He admitted feeling guilty during the kiss, acknowledging his marital status and stating that he decided not to pursue further physical intimacy. Rushton expressed remorse for any hurt caused, but the court found his account to be unreliable.
Judge Karim Ezzat presided over the case and ultimately found Rushton to be an unreliable witness, ruling in favor of the victim's account that there was no prior intimacy before the assault. The judge emphasized that Rushton’s behavior was driven solely by sexual desire and that he took advantage of the victim’s vulnerable state. The court noted that Rushton showed no apparent remorse and appeared to believe he had done nothing wrong.
In addition to the prison sentence, Rushton was ordered to pay £3,000 in court costs. He was also placed under a sexual harm prevention order for ten years and registered as a sex offender for the same period. The judge highlighted the severity of the breach of trust and the emotional trauma inflicted upon the victim, condemning Rushton’s actions as a clear abuse of his position and trust.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of respecting personal boundaries and the devastating consequences of exploiting vulnerable individuals. The community continues to grapple with the implications of such conduct, and the legal system has sent a firm message that such behavior will not be tolerated.
According to court records, Rushton assaulted a woman who was staying at the hotel that night. The woman, who had consumed a large amount of alcohol, woke up in Rushton's hotel room with no memory of how she arrived there or what had transpired. The assault involved Rushton taking photographs of himself sexually touching her while she was unconscious in bed. The images included explicit photographs of her naked bottom and showed Rushton's hands moving towards her private parts. The victim described the incident as highly embarrassing and very uncomfortable, expressing her distress over the violation of her trust.
It was only two years later that Rushton's wife discovered images of the woman on his computer. Concerned, she reported her findings to the police, which initiated an investigation. The authorities eventually contacted the victim in 2021, and she confirmed that the images depicted her. However, she was unable to recall the specific details of the night Rushton assaulted her. During the investigation, law enforcement also uncovered additional disturbing material on Rushton's devices, including photographs taken upskirt of women using public transport, further highlighting a pattern of inappropriate behavior.
During the court proceedings, the victim testified about the emotional impact of the incident, emphasizing her feelings of embarrassment and discomfort. She stated that Rushton was an attractive man but made it clear that she was not attracted to him and would not have consented to any sexual activity. She firmly believed that she would not have allowed such an encounter to happen, given her own understanding of her boundaries and feelings.
Rushton, who has been practicing veterinary medicine since 2007 at the Village Vet practice in Hampstead, attempted to justify his actions by claiming that the woman had flirted with him earlier that evening. He described how she had draped herself across him while sitting on a chair, stroked his goatee and hair, and indicated she wanted to continue their interaction. Rushton claimed that they had gone into his room, where they lay on the bed fully clothed before kissing more intensely. He admitted feeling guilty during the kiss, acknowledging his marital status and stating that he decided not to pursue further physical intimacy. Rushton expressed remorse for any hurt caused, but the court found his account to be unreliable.
Judge Karim Ezzat presided over the case and ultimately found Rushton to be an unreliable witness, ruling in favor of the victim's account that there was no prior intimacy before the assault. The judge emphasized that Rushton’s behavior was driven solely by sexual desire and that he took advantage of the victim’s vulnerable state. The court noted that Rushton showed no apparent remorse and appeared to believe he had done nothing wrong.
In addition to the prison sentence, Rushton was ordered to pay £3,000 in court costs. He was also placed under a sexual harm prevention order for ten years and registered as a sex offender for the same period. The judge highlighted the severity of the breach of trust and the emotional trauma inflicted upon the victim, condemning Rushton’s actions as a clear abuse of his position and trust.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of respecting personal boundaries and the devastating consequences of exploiting vulnerable individuals. The community continues to grapple with the implications of such conduct, and the legal system has sent a firm message that such behavior will not be tolerated.