Jamie Martin's Social Media Accounts
Know a Social Media Account Linked to Jamie Martin?
Want to add information? Log in to your account to contribute accounts and phone numbers.
JAMIE MARTIN CAUGHT WITH CHILD INDECENT IMAGES IN MINSTER: COURT DECISION SPARKS CONTROVERSY
In June 2018, Jamie Martin, a young man from Minster, was found guilty of possessing a large collection of indecent images and videos depicting children. Despite overwhelming evidence against him, Martin, who was 21 at the time, managed to avoid immediate imprisonment due to concerns about his academic future and personal development.Martin, a university student residing on Buckthorne Road in Minster, faced seven charges related to the making and possession of indecent images of children. The evidence presented at Maidstone Crown Court revealed that he had stored a significant number of illicit materials on his devices. Specifically, he was found to have 37 video clips classified in the most serious category, 21 in the next level, and eight still images in the lowest category, all discovered on October 26 of the previous year.
Furthermore, authorities uncovered that between February 1 and October 27 of the same year, Martin possessed 56 still images in the highest category, 96 in the next, and a staggering 692 in the lowest category. Some of the children depicted in the images and videos were as young as one to three years old. It was reported that Martin deleted some of these images after learning that his father had been arrested in connection with related investigations.
During the court proceedings, Martin initially attempted to shift blame onto his father, claiming responsibility for the illicit material. However, the court quickly dismissed this assertion, clarifying that his father could not have been responsible for the content. The judge, David Griffith-Jones QC, noted that Martin then changed his stance, withdrawing his initial claim.
Judge Griffith-Jones also highlighted that Martin sought to involve family and friends by providing a fabricated alibi for specific times and dates, which was quickly exposed as false. Despite the gravity of the case, the judge acknowledged that Martin appeared to be a