JAMES SIM FROM RUTHERGLEN INVOLVED IN CHILD ABUSE AND POSSESSION OF INDECENT IMAGES
| Red Rose Database
Rutherglen Child Sexual Abuser
In a disturbing case that has shocked the community of Rutherglen, South Lanarkshire, James Sim, aged 45, has admitted to a series of heinous crimes involving the sexual abuse of minors and the possession of indecent images. The details emerged during a court hearing at the High Court in Glasgow, revealing a troubling pattern of criminal behavior spanning several decades.
Sim was found to have sexually abused a young boy, whose identity remains protected for legal reasons, between the years 1990 and 1997. The victim, now in his twenties and currently serving a prison sentence for his own offenses involving young boys, was just between the ages of eight and thirteen at the time of the abuse. The court heard that Sim’s misconduct extended further back, with him admitting to abusing another boy in 1980, when that child was only seven years old.
Adding to the gravity of his crimes, Sim also confessed to possessing a staggering 1,009 indecent images of children on his computer. The court was informed that these images included photographs and videos depicting minors in explicit situations, highlighting the extent of Sim’s disturbing activities.
During the proceedings, it was revealed that Sim had recorded a video of himself with the young victim while he was babysitting. The court heard that Sim instructed the boy not to disclose what had happened, creating an environment of secrecy and manipulation. The victim later discovered a video of himself and Sim, both naked, which he believed was taken when he was around 11 or 12 years old. The victim expressed feelings of shame and embarrassment upon realizing he had been filmed without his knowledge.
Following this discovery, the victim confided in his mother, showing her the video and revealing the abuse. His mother confronted Sim directly, expressing her outrage and disbelief, saying, “How could you do this. We trusted you.”
When questioned by police, Sim admitted to the abuse, claiming that he did not think the victim enjoyed it, but also stating that the boy never explicitly said no. His plea for leniency was deferred, and he was remanded in custody pending sentencing. The case has brought to light the disturbing history of a man from Rutherglen whose actions have had a lasting impact on his victims and the community at large.
Sim was found to have sexually abused a young boy, whose identity remains protected for legal reasons, between the years 1990 and 1997. The victim, now in his twenties and currently serving a prison sentence for his own offenses involving young boys, was just between the ages of eight and thirteen at the time of the abuse. The court heard that Sim’s misconduct extended further back, with him admitting to abusing another boy in 1980, when that child was only seven years old.
Adding to the gravity of his crimes, Sim also confessed to possessing a staggering 1,009 indecent images of children on his computer. The court was informed that these images included photographs and videos depicting minors in explicit situations, highlighting the extent of Sim’s disturbing activities.
During the proceedings, it was revealed that Sim had recorded a video of himself with the young victim while he was babysitting. The court heard that Sim instructed the boy not to disclose what had happened, creating an environment of secrecy and manipulation. The victim later discovered a video of himself and Sim, both naked, which he believed was taken when he was around 11 or 12 years old. The victim expressed feelings of shame and embarrassment upon realizing he had been filmed without his knowledge.
Following this discovery, the victim confided in his mother, showing her the video and revealing the abuse. His mother confronted Sim directly, expressing her outrage and disbelief, saying, “How could you do this. We trusted you.”
When questioned by police, Sim admitted to the abuse, claiming that he did not think the victim enjoyed it, but also stating that the boy never explicitly said no. His plea for leniency was deferred, and he was remanded in custody pending sentencing. The case has brought to light the disturbing history of a man from Rutherglen whose actions have had a lasting impact on his victims and the community at large.